Revert SEO edits added to whole building

changeset/170695564

Hi, you've added this onto the building as a whole. I've reverted it, if you wish to add your business, please add it as a node within the bounds of the building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170601778

There is the possibility they're signed as part of a walking/cycling route, but if not then I'd say removing it is fine, if it's a highway=footway way.

Designated means there's some kind of signage.

Access=no isn't needed since it's assumed by default that cars can't go on footpaths, you generally only need to add restrictions if it differs from the norm. You've actually excluded bicycles here, which are legally allowed on footpaths.

Hi, is there a reason for tagging access=no? Also, is there signage for walking, if not then foot=designated isn't correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170473566

Hi vajayjay_u,

Your changeset comment seems to indicate that you're using sources that you haven't mentioned in your changeset tags. Can you let me know what the source for these edits are?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Google Earth isn't a source we can use, if you have other edits that have been made based on Google Earth and that can't be backed up by another source (or that you haven't confirmed in person), they should probably be reverted.

Fully agree with what you've said, and if there's concerns about how dangerous something is, there's likely a way to tag it as such. Similar to how we tag private trails and roads as such instead of removing them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170366795

Hi, this building doesn't match up to what's showing on aerial imagery, has it recently been built?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170234486

Hi Peacock 7784,

Can you please explain the reason why these have been deleted? Do they no longer exist, or has something else happened to them?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi Peacock 7784,

Can you please explain the reason why these have been deleted? Do they no longer exist, or has something else happened to them?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi Peacock 7784,

Can you please explain the reason why these have been deleted? Do they no longer exist, or has something else happened to them?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Also, where you've removed the bits of road going across the road named 早稲田通り, are you able to turn right there at all?

Hi, it's expected that your changeset comment describes your edit. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi Shefu89, it's best to change the existing objects instead of deleting and recreating them. See osm.wiki/Keep_the_history for more info.

A lot of these multipolygons don't need to be mapped as such, they can just be a single closed way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170012591

Also, has the running track actually been removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169941795

It's just the unmade at the end of the name bit that I'm thinking about. The name is fine, but if unmade isn't part of the name, it should just be Schultz Road

Hi, is unmade part of the actual name of the road, if not that should be removed, and the other tags you've used will cover that
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169952771

Hi Mail Mailowy,

Can you please let me know what the source of the road name change is, as you've only listed aerial imagery in imagery_used, which in most cases would not contain visible street names.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group