OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164230586 | Hi, you've removed this from being a road route, this has nothing to do with being a bike route.
|
|
| 164148896 | Also just wondering, is Selgar Avenue Link Road signposted, DataSA's Roads dataset has it as just Selgar Link.
|
|
| 164192709 | Hi, the new highway way here doesn't seem to match up to the imagery listed as used.
|
|
| 164148896 | These are legitimate, there's a major public works project in this area.
|
|
| 164145846 | Hey there, good work! I'd recommend pressing the Q button after drawing a building to square it off, and the only other recommendation would be that some of the buildings you've tagged as building=garage might be better off as building=shed (for example way/1371951932), if you're not sure whether it's one or the other you can just leave it as building=yes.
|
|
| 164126307 | Hey, I'm not quite sure if this a building from the looks of it, it could possibly be a sun shade on a playground. Might be worth checking if there's any street level imagery you can use to confirm.
|
|
| 164126376 | Hey, this should be highway=unclassified, it's the same level as residential but where the primary use isn't for access to housing.
|
|
| 163981873 | For the parking area, the highway=service way should continue through the parking area, not end at the edges of it.
|
|
| 163977628 | Hey, if you're not sure what the name is, you should delete the tag, not set it to unknown
|
|
| 163626547 | Hi, just wondering what the source is for this and other similar edits? |
|
| 163463834 | There's also a dragged node on way/1111001526, probably easiest to revert the whole changeset. There's also no usage at all for that tag in AU, plus someone else has raised privacy concerns on another changeset.
|
|
| 163355454 | Sometimes an edit like this is best done on a wide scale in a single changeset. It's been discussed, all the edits are related, and the discussion is linked. |
|
| 163279421 | Hi, information from a council's Your Say page is generally copyrighted, meaning we can't use it. Are you able to either confirm this in person, or using another source? |
|
| 163309358 | Thanks for that! The Wiki has some good resources in regards to allowable data sources, Australia has a list here: osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources and a global list is here: osm.wiki/Potential_datasources Still need to double check the licensing, you'll see in the AU list that there's some under CC-BY-SA which we normally can't use, but we've received a waiver from the data owner specifically allowing us to use it (we can't meet the attribution requirements as per the license, but often we'll get permission to have it listed elsewhere) |
|
| 163309358 | Freely available doesn't mean compatible with the ODbL, which is required when using external data sources in OpenStreetMap as that's the license OSM itself is released under. |
|
| 163309884 | You've added a tag as part of this changeset, addr:street=From. You'll either want to remove that, or update the address tags in general to reflect the new address. |
|
| 163309358 | If you're not sure of the licensing right now, it might be best to consider reverting this changeset, unless you're able to find some source with all of these details. |
|
| 163309358 | Hi, are those sources available under an open license? Having a look at metar-taf.com, there isn't any mention of a license, which means it would be copyrighted and unsuitable for use in OpenStreetMap.
|
|
| 163309884 | Hi, you've set the street address to just "From"
|
|
| 163190661 | Hi, what is the source for these changes? Also, you've added power=plant and an alt_name tag to way/698041954, which is a road.
|