Hi there, is there any particular reason why you've split Main North Road near way/1230460423, there's only painted lanes there, which shouldn't result in the road being mapped as dual carriageway (osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway for reference).

Both Bing and ESRI aerial imagery don't show any physical separation, I've driven through here nearly weekly and never seen physical separation either, plus there's no need for that for routing to occur (as per your changeset comment).

Best way to represent the turning lane there would just be with turn:lanes tags. Don't need additional ways or the restriction relation, and it reflects ground truth then.

I didn't update anything to do with naming, the update was to the highway classification. This was mapped based on what is on the ground.

This is based on surveys, aerial imagery, and local knowledge.

Why has Sixth Street been changed from residential to tertiary, yet Ruskin Road has been changed from tertiary to residential? That makes no sense at all.

Ruskin is a 100km/h road linking two locations, and definitely wouldn't be considered residential at all, if it's not tertiary it should be unclassified.

Sixth is a small residential street with a turning circle, definitely not tertiary in any definition.

Hey there, are these areas actually named (with signs or something verifiable on the ground) Overnight Camping and Overflow Camping or are they just descriptions?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144984632

Hey, this has been constructed and was mapped during a survey, and the building you've added has been completely demolished. I've reverted this changeset due to those reasons.

I've updated the way to reflect what I've mentioned above.

Hey, what you've put in name should really go into a note tag, and then you can set noname=yes to indicate the lack of name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144885836

I did notice that today funnily enough, looks fairly accurate at least.

Seems a bit odd, I'm able to see both ESRI and ESRI Clarity over this area

Yeah Bing usually tends to be a little behind, ESRI tends to be a little more up to date at least, just lower quality in more urban areas.

Bing shows the parts of Berrimah Road that you've marked as construction, as existing roads. Have those roads been removed in order to be rebuilt?

Sweet thanks!

I've added the turn:lanes tags in changeset/144603579

The turn lanes were moved to only be where they were physically separate. If I didn’t add turn:lanes tags to show the turn lanes while they’re part of the main way I’ll go back and add those in when I have a chance.

Hi, you've changed the address of this node, however this does not update the location. Can you please move the node to the correct location?

Hey, the addr:street tag you've added doesn't match any of the street names nearby and also includes a number, I can see you've tagged 1/2 as Waikiki Court, any chance you can confirm that 1/1 should also be tagged as such/fix it?

Hey, you've actually set addr:street for this node to 17, can you confirm if it's actually Wyatt Road/edit it to fix that?

There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
osm.wiki/Relation:restriction