It's not possible afterwards, but having it in here is the closest you'd get, thanks for clarifying.

Hi Jack, is there anything on that site indicating that the content is public domain? If not, it's copywrited and we'd need to use another source or map on the ground to add this in.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147199186

Hi, can you provide any further details on this change? You've done one that spans two continents with no description of what you've actually changed.

Hi there, this seems like a mechanical edit that has changed two nodes labelled "Verso Books", despite the Wikipedia and WikiData entries only applying to one of those. Please don't perform mechanical edits like this without discussing first, or if it's small like this, manually check each change before submitting. I've reverted the change to node/7738540146 since it's incorrect.

There's a few houses near Peerless/Stebonheath Road in Munno Para West that have some bits that aren't 90 degrees and didn't look like it matched up with imagery.

Hi Melan839, even community groups are potentially subject to the Organised editing rules/guidelines.

Hi, addr:housenumber shouldn't be used for the unit numbers, you've also removed the house and street numbers. I'd give addr:=** a read for more info on adding addresses, but for now I'm going to revert this since it's removed data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147042978

Thanks for catching that one for me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147030832

Hey, it would be best to just map the whole parking area as amenity=parking. Also, the section near the north west part of the building isn't really parking.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147005374

Whoops, thanks for catching the typo!

Hey there, pressing W in both of and JOSM will square off buildings, it’s a good idea to do this where possible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146979571

Which users is this from? Are they giving you the information under the expectation that it's public domain or provided under a license that allows for it's use here?

You should make sure that the actual source is documented in your changeset, all you have listed is Bing Maps Aerial from iD automatically adding it.

I'd also recommend smaller, more local changesets as well, instead of one covering 4 continents.

Hi, what is the source for this addition of ATMs across multiple continents?

Hi, highways/roads (including service roads) shouldn't be mapped separately unless there's a physical separation. I don't see why there would have been issues with how it was previously mapped, and adding access=private may potentially cause more issues for routing, since it implies permission is required before going on that highway/road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732596

Hi, you've added the gate tags both to a node and a way, they should only exist on one of them. You also probably don't need some of the tags, especially things like opening_hours.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732068

Hey, oneway shouldn't be set on here if there's no other way to get out, this would break routing further.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732302

I've reverted this changeset since everything indicated these were just removed to remove "clutter" in a specific rendering of OSM.

changeset/146693149

I was just pointing out how CC-BY alone isn't enough for OSM and how we require the waiver.

The license on their website ic CC-BY 4.0, which means attribution is required. We can't provide that directly so we need a waiver (like we have for DataSA) that states attribution through the Wiki is acceptable instead of direct attribution where we use the data.

Hey, opening hours need to be formatted a specific way, I've updated them for you.
opening_hours=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146449422