This changeset along with many others (107519354, 107519614, 107519790, 107519853, 107519924, 107519957, 107519998, 107520044, 107520081, 107520126, 107520191, 107520214, 107520240, 107520278, 107520316, 107520330, 107520435, 107520499, 107520534, 107520553, 107520571, 107520589, 107520631, 107520645, 107520667, 107520747, 107520771, 107520799, 107520823, 107520830, 107520850, 107520893, 107520923, 107706137, 107706237, 107706318, 107706446, 107706549, 107706614, 107706705, 107706840, 107706895, 107758579) has multiple issues. The extent of these changes made me hurry up contacting the DWG for a revert. Unfortunately, the DWG member who took this over backed out quickly and didn't respond to my latest email. I hope he is well.
One of the issues is that you deleted objects that I had carefully mapped, without even asking me, e.g. way/496237198 (a path that is visible even on aerial images), node/1446279919 (a memorial), way/131409550 (the Kaleidoskop) and some picnic sites. You also deleted single tags, e.g. leisure=* and description=* on way/496237197.
But the worst part of these edits is that you did a mass edit with 42 changesets, changing highway=path to highway=via ferrata and deleting sport=via_ferrata. This is clearly a semi-automated mass edit, and as such violates the automated edits code of conduct (also known as mechanical edits policy) which requires a dedicated account, a wiki page, and on top of that all a proper discussion within the community (typically in a mailing list) BEFORE the edit is done. See: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plansWhile most tags are generally accepted by all mappers (e.g. nobody will disagree on highway=motorway for an Autobahn), some are controversial. I bet you'll understand that everyone changing all the tags to his own likes would quickly lead to huge edit wars.
highway=via_ferrata is such a controversial tag. Feel free to use it when you are the first to map a ferrata, but please accept that many other mappers have good reasons to NOT use that tag. Don't try to use mass edits to enforce your personal tagging taste upon others.
I am always open for tagging debates. Feel free to contact me via PM or in the wiki (osm.wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/via_ferrata) to discuss why you like higway=via_ferrata and why I don't. But whatever the outcome of such a debate is, it won't justify the automated edits. And there's simply no time for lengthy discusssions before doing the reverts, because they get increasingly difficult when other users edit the objects in the meantime. That's why I would very much appreciate if you could tell the DWG that you are ok with the reverts.

Kreuz- und Themenwegstationen tagge ich mit Rolle "station". Das ist kein Standard, aber ich glaube, schaden kann es auch nicht. Wie auch immer. Ich hab den Changeset nur zufällig entdeckt (weil ich geschaut habe, wann du zuletzt aktiv warst) und freue mich, dass du die 2 Themenwege gemappt hast, weil ich damit ein Ausflugsziel habe, das ich noch nicht kannte.

way/281027124 hast du angelegt. Ich schlage vor, ihn zu löschen, weil es hier nirgends ein natürliches Grasland gibt. Von Natur aus wär fast alles Wald, bis auf die Gewässer und vielleicht ein paar Sanddünen und Kiesbänke. Die Wälder sind mittlerweile gemappt, und die Wiesen etc. sollten einzeln gemappt werden. Derzeit dient das grassland-Objekt nur als hellgrüner Hintergrund, der überall durchscheint, wo kein Wald gemappt ist. Das hält die Leute davon ab, die unbewaldeten Flächen richtig (d.h. einzeln und mit passenden Tags) zu mappen, weil sie durch die hellgrüne Farbe glauben, dass sie eh schon gemappt sind.

Weil wir grad bei den Namen sind: Der Viewpoint östlich von hier heißt wahrscheinlich nicht wirklich "Ötschergräben", sondern man sie sie von dort aus nur.

Die Daten sind überprüfbar. Dass man dafür zahlen muss, ist beim Grundbuchauszug oder bei ISO-Normen genauso. Dafür haben wir ja OSM, damit es zu sonst konstenpflichtigen Daten ein freies und kostenloses Äuquivalent gibt.
Als Mapper steht es uns nicht zu, uns bessere Namen selber auszudenken, sondern wir müssen die übernehmen, die dokumentiert sind.
Aber vielleicht ist es doch besser, den Namen in OSM zu entfernen bzw. nur in description=* anzumerken, weil er nur provisorisch ist. Wie gesagt kann derjenige, der die Höhle letzlich vermessen tut, den Namen noch abändern. Als endgültig gilt ein Name erst dann, wenn er in einer einschlägigen Zeitung publiziert ist.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794484 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013857

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794461 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013828

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794446 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013807

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794428 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013767

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794419 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013643

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794410 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013622

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794401 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013600

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794391 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013586

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794382 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013544

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794377 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013372

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794369 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013224

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794358 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013204

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794343 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013035

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794335 where the changeset comment is: revert 106013011

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/110794325 where the changeset comment is: revert 106012981