Hello.
Thanks for your edits.
Regarding the private and gated areas, there is a standard that you have to know.
If a street has a gate, you should add the gate, mark it with access=private, and then only mark the street as private from the gate inside. The part outside that gate is not private for OSM purposes.
This is not a serious problem, and I am fixing it right now.
Please keep up the edits, we need them.

Toy is invited to join the Chilean community on Telegram through the link in my profile. There, we discuss all these things and solve new mappers´ doubts.

regards

Hola. Muchas gracias por los aportes.
Te pedimos por favor eso si agregar tildes. Necesitamos que todo esté bien escrito. Yo lo voy a arreglar ahora.
Saludos

Hello.
You can square the buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162984745

Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards

Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards

Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards

Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards

Reverted
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162950742

Estimado. Somos tres maperos a estas alturas revisando sus ediciones. Le peidmos por favor identificarse y tomar contacto con quienes le están comentando los cambios. Sus ediciones han consumido el tiempo de mucha gente en los intentos por corregirlas. Por favor mostrar un poco de respeto.
Saludos

more than half of this cycleway is invented

100% fictional
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162949518

corrected

almost 50% of this cycleway does not exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162948111

This is just fiction

This is a painfully schematic and low-standard drawing of the real cycleway. Please refrain from making these editions if you are unwilling to spend the proper amount of time doing the correct drawings.
One thing is to correct mistakes, but this is just laziness and even vandalism at some level.

regards

Does this connection with Alfonso Suarez even exist?
the picture is pretty recent. Is there a link with this new construction?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162908757

The cycleway is not even on that side of the street..... what is this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162908032

Hola. No se trata solo de dibujar el trazado de la ciclovía. Hay que hacer las conexiones en cada esquina y preocuparse de que sea con los tags correctos. Además por favor no usar nombres genéricos.

Hola. La ciclovía ya estaba agregada, solo que formaba parte de la calle. No hace falta agregarla otra vez.
Pero además veo que agregó dos ciclovías, una en cada sentido. Está bien eso?

Ok. Thank you very much.
Regards