emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138937037 | Reverted in changeset/138945311 for vandalism, deleting valid relations and mistagging objects |
|
| 138937399 | Reverted in changeset/138945311 for vandalism, deleting relations and mistagging objects |
|
| 138786624 | Hi, Why do all of the nodes of the campsite have "ele=0.0" tags? |
|
| 138916956 | Hi, on way/962259484 can you please fix the height value? Thanks! |
|
| 138914770 | Hi, Thanks for your changes, however the park is not entirely forest, so it's not correct to add the tag to the park. If you want, you can draw a new area over the wooded parts and mark them as forests |
|
| 138874125 | Hi, Thanks for your contributions, but in OSM most roads do not need a relation, they only need a relation if they are signed roads (county, state, interstate, etc). |
|
| 138707964 | Hi, You created this way with no tags, could you please go back and fix it? Thanks!
|
|
| 138690970 | Reverted in changeset/138807579 for suspected vandalism |
|
| 138762839 | Hi, Once again please be sure to follow standard OSM unit values (osm.wiki/Map_features/Units), "0.6 yard" is not valid. Could you please fix this? Thanks! way/1190819377 |
|
| 138727722 | Hi, Please do not tag individual parking spaces as their own parking lot, that is what the amenity=parking_space tag is for: amenity=parking_space Could you please fix this? Thanks! |
|
| 138644265 | Hi, You added a way with no tags here way/1190288333 could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
|
| 138630035 | Hi, You added a way with no tags here: way/1190215762 could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
|
| 138659024 | Hi, You created a way with no tags, could you please go back and add tags? Thanks! way/1190346564 |
|
| 138690970 | Hi, Do these tracks no longer exist? "Private and inaccessible" tracks should not be deleted unless they actually no longer exist. |
|
| 135096633 | You're right, I looked back and didn't realize how many other changes there were. I've gone through and undid all the changes not related to the classification |
|
| 138676190 | No, they always need to be there, otherwise how will routers know how to get in and out of the parking lot? |
|
| 138676433 | Hi, building:part areas can overlap building areas, that is what they are designed for. I'll revert this changeset for you, but please make sure you understand what each tag means before you delete things. |
|
| 138676190 | Hi, Why did you delete all of the service roads in the parking lots? Are they no longer there? |
|
| 135096633 | Sure, but that's assuming that it was incorrectly added in the first place, which is something i'm not able to verify. My thought process was that if it is incorrect, then someone with local knowledge would come along and fix it. |
|
| 135096633 | it was a straight revert, so it shouldn't have added anything new. Do you have a link to a way where it wasn't there before? |