wasn't planning on it, i only fixed those two because they were tagged as golf=hole

Looks good, thanks for contributing!

Thanks!

Hi,

did you mean to disconnect way/1143821863 from way/1075911546?

Hi,

You added building=yes to this road way/1151389302, would you mind taking a look at it? Thanks!

Hi,

Looks like you accidentally created a way with no tags here: way/1151213579

Would you mind fixing this? Thanks!

That doesnt matter for the lanes tag, please see the wiki article (lanes=*) where it says "Note that it is valid to tag lanes count also in case where lanes are not marked with paint on the surface"

The correct way to tag roads with no lane markings is the lane_markings=no tag (lane_markings=*)

Hi,

Why did you delete the lanes tag from way/680624189 way/9629522 and way/9761537 ?

Hi,

Thanks for your addition! It's hard to tell from the aerial imagery, but is way/1151338326 the actual shape of the building, or the area around the building?

Deleting valid data because you don't like that a company added it is also clearly in violation of the OSM rules.

That was verifiably a real business, the node was in the right place, all the data was there, just the tags were wrong, so that's not 'misuse'.

Reverted for vandalism in changeset/133306235

??

Very clearly a legitimate business that just didn't know how to use iD. I'm reverting this and fixing up the tags. You can't say there's not 'any valid tag' when there's a valid website, name, address, phone number, and a tag describing what it is

Hi,

This changeset duplicated three power pole nodes: node/10706724301
node/10706724302
node/10706724300

Can you please fix those? Thanks

Hi,

When mapping golf courses, please don't add a name or description tag to holes, fairways, greens, or tee boxes. See leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for more details. Would you mind removing those?

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the map! Just fyi, while it's not wrong to add it, it's pointless adding foot=designated or highway=footway, because it's implied. So you don't need to spend time adding that tag

Hi,

Did you mean to put foot=designated and bicycle=designated on the road?

*street lamps, not traffic lights, sorry

Hi,

This changeset duplicated dozens of traffic lights. There's too many to list here, but you can see the map overview at https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=14&lat=48.39343&lon=-97.73792&item=1230&level=1,2,3&tags=&fixable=&username=&source=&class=3

Every one of those pins is a duplicated node from this changeset, please fix this, thanks!

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! It mostly looks good, but i have a couple quick fixes for you:
For the parking lot, operator:type should be 'religious' (see operator:type=*?uselang=en)

The surface tag for the parking lot and roads needs to be a single value (see common values here: surface=*#Unpaved), not multiple values with a / between. It looks like it could be either 'compacted' or 'fine_gravel'

When a parking lot surrounds a building like this, the cleanest way to map it is called a multipolygon (osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD). You'll map it like the example, except the outer way is the parking lot and the inner way is the church. That way there's not a weird line going through the parking lot.

Hope this helps, let me know if you have any questions!

Hi,

This changeset introduced node/10704538351 which is a duplicate of node/10681995817, can you please fix this?