OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
130068352

Hi,

This changeset drew a new road overtop of an existing road. Please fix this, thanks!

129662340

Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, could you please fix this? Thanks!

130036601

Hi,

A couple things:
1. Don't put "fdbgf" as a changeset comment, you need to accurately describe what you changed
2. Don't double-tag objects, there was already a hotel mapped. Please delete the hotel you mapped.

Thanks!

128859509

Hi!

Just a quick note for the future, when you're editing traffic signals in iD, it's a good idea to hide landuses and boundaries. Several traffic signals i fixed from this changeset were added to the admin boundary, not the road.

128207874

Hi,

Can you please fix the website on way/1107938636
Thanks!

130018917

thanks!

129915813

Hi,

When you use highway=proposed, you can't use the construction tag, you have to use the proposed tag (see highway=proposed?uselang=en)

130011985

You removed the highway tag from way/221656349, please fix it. Thanks

130018917

and also this landuse node/6298603454

130018917

Hi,

Looks like you accidentally dragged a corner of this building: way/946960719
Would you mind fixing that? Thanks!

130019217

Hi,

In OSM, there's a principle called osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element, which means that, for example, you shouldn't draw a cycleway on a service road. The cycle route was already connected by the service road, so there's no need to draw anything else to connect it. Would you mind deleting that? Thanks!

130014833

Okay, so the problem with that is you're going to remove them, and someone else is going to put them back, then you're going to remove them, in an infinite loop. The correct way to deal with these kinds of trails is to add the tags access=no and informal=yes. That way everyone knows that they aren't meant to be used

130014833

*Some form of trails in those locations

130014833

Hi,

I'm curious about the trails in Heritage Park that you deleted. They were created not that long ago, and public GPS traces show people using some form of trails. Are they really non-existent, or are they just not official or not supposed to be used?

129980736

Hi,

Please don't delete features like fairways if you're just going to recreate the same thing. That is not fair to the person who originally made the fairway, since you're removing the work they put into it for no reason. Thanks!

129994769

Hi!

Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Just as a tip, please add access=private to backyard swimming pools so it's clear they aren't meant for public use. Thanks!

129903560

Hi,

Thank you for your contribution, however, please split up your changesets so that they don't span the entire united states, this makes it impossible to do QA checks on your changes. Keeping it to one state or less, except for documented imports or cleanups, is a good rule of thumb. Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129903560

129875532

Hi,

You appear to have drawn over the Sandwich street that was already there. Could you please delete your changes and add the missing attributes to the already existing version of the street? Thanks!

129880038

Hi again! A couple more quick tips, if you are wondering how to tag something, clicking the feature type and searching in there will usually give you what you're looking for, so if you were to type in "daycare" you would see the Nursery/Childcare preset, which is what you're looking for here.
Also, if you're drawing a building, it should match the actual building, it shouldn't include the playground or outside grounds of the facility, those are mapped separately.

129879798

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! One thing to note, generally a rule of thumb is we don't put duplicate information on points and buildings. So since you already have amenity=cafe, outdoor_seating=yes, and the names of the shops on the points, the building shouldn't have any of those tags, it can just have building=retail