Hey there,

Would you mind going back and double checking the tags on way/1175208129? I think it's supposed to be part of the path, but i'm not 100% sure

Reverted, please only edit the areas included in the HOTOSM project, don't go outside of that area

Hi,

Thanks for the additions! Just a note, streams are waterway=stream, natural=water+water=stream is supposed to be on closed ways for the banks of the stream. Could you please fix that? Thanks!

Hi,

Thanks for adding the houses! Just a note, when you went to upload, the editor warned you that one of your buildings was crossing over itself. While it can be wrong, it's best to always take a look to make sure that you didn't accidentally break something. In this case, you dragged node/10154531466 and broke the rendering of that house. Could you please go back and fix that? Thanks!

Reverted in changeset/143710581, please only edit the areas that are assigned to you

Hi,

Please stop changing the address, it was in the correct format before.

Removed, located nowhere near Maple Park Drive

Hi,

Please stop changing the address. Street names in OSM are not abbreviated, if you keep changing it you will be reported for vandalism.

Hey there,

Thanks for mapping these! I didn't check all of them, but the ones i checked looked fine.

Also, it's worth noting that in Michigan, Esri Clarity is over 10 years old (2010-2012), so if you use it, it's worth double checking that the buildings still exist on Bing, normal Esri, or NAIP, since those are newer imagery.

Happy mapping!

Residential building with no sign of business, removing

Hi there,

Multipolygons are not necessary if they only include one area, putting the golf tags on the area is more accurate and easier to maintain. Also, multipolygons must have at least one "outer" role, otherwise nothing will render it

Hi there,

A couple of your objects seem to have messed up surface tags, i assume they're meant to be "ground" but figured i would double check with you:

way/1218153799
way/1218153798
way/1218153797

Thanks!

Hey there,

I don't know if Vespucci is doing this automatically or not, but "parking:orientation" has been deprecated for about a year now in favor of "orientation". I've updated all the instances from this changeset, but just wanted to let you know about that if you didn't already.

Hi,

There's several nodes with "crossing=2", would you mind double-checking to make sure that's what is intended?

node/11285670963
node/11285670965
node/11285671152
node/11285671155
node/11285671154
node/11285670964
node/11285671153
node/11285670962

Thanks! I'm not an infrastructure mapper, so i'm not sure what the best practices are surrounding that, might have to check the wiki or ask in Slack/Discord

No, the correct way is to use a tunnel tag and add layer=-1, not to connect it to the road.

Hi there,

Not sure what you mean with crossing=w way/1217641282 crossing=only_road_w way/1217641310

Would you mind going back and fixing those? Thanks!

Hi,

Please stop doing things just to "fix" validator warnings, if you aren't sure what you're doing you're only going to make the map worse. You should never add negative layers to bodies of water like way/572188561 and way/572188562

Hi,

What does "marked as proposed" mean in this context?

*name of the object