emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138690970 | Hi, Do these tracks no longer exist? "Private and inaccessible" tracks should not be deleted unless they actually no longer exist. |
|
| 135096633 | You're right, I looked back and didn't realize how many other changes there were. I've gone through and undid all the changes not related to the classification |
|
| 138676190 | No, they always need to be there, otherwise how will routers know how to get in and out of the parking lot? |
|
| 138676433 | Hi, building:part areas can overlap building areas, that is what they are designed for. I'll revert this changeset for you, but please make sure you understand what each tag means before you delete things. |
|
| 138676190 | Hi, Why did you delete all of the service roads in the parking lots? Are they no longer there? |
|
| 135096633 | Sure, but that's assuming that it was incorrectly added in the first place, which is something i'm not able to verify. My thought process was that if it is incorrect, then someone with local knowledge would come along and fix it. |
|
| 135096633 | it was a straight revert, so it shouldn't have added anything new. Do you have a link to a way where it wasn't there before? |
|
| 138596809 | Hi, waterway=spillway has been deprecated for a while now, could you please change these to the standard, shown here: usage=spillway Thanks! |
|
| 138633412 | Hi, What is node/11051547342 supposed to be? |
|
| 138544186 | There's not currently a standardized way in OSM to indicate objects with varying height, some people use "incline" to try and work around it (see osm.wiki/Talk:Key:height#Varying_height) |
|
| 138526113 | Hi, This changeset created a lot of ways with no tags, were you planning to do something with them? |
|
| 138446678 | Hi, So for neighborhood boundaries, you can either do place=neighborhood like you did earlier, or you can do type=boundary, but you can't do both, you have to pick one or the other. It doesn't really matter which, although according to place=neighbourhood?uselang=en#How_to_map the boundary relation is more common. |
|
| 138304112 | Hi, "height" values need to follow the OSM unit specifications (height=*?uselang=en#Examples), so "3 ft" is not a valid unit, it needs to be 3'. Could you please fix these? Thanks! |
|
| 138544186 | Hi, "0 - 1 - 0" is not a valid value for height. Can you please explain what you were trying to show here? |
|
| 138561947 | Also, you have a lot of name fields with multiple values, which is uncommon. Could you please give your source for these changes? |
|
| 138561947 | Hi, On way/1165957224, you put "voltage:primary" and "voltage:secondary" on this area, these tags can only be used on transformers. Could you please fix this? Thanks! |
|
| 138507319 | oops, that was supposed to be "remove duplicate power line |
|
| 138343930 | Hi, Are you sure these should be in the name tag? Generally apartment numbers are either addr:housenumber or ref |
|
| 138312433 | Hi, Thanks for your contributions! Please note that conditional restrictions are not valid inside the main access tags, they need to be in a separate tag, so for example "bicycle:conditional", motor_vehicle:conditional", etc. See osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Traffic_modes for more examples. Would you mind fixing these? Thanks! |
|
| 138235463 | Hi, Thanks for your contributions, however, i've had to revert your changes because they were causing routing errors. The correct way to show that a road is dirt is to click on the road, and then go to the "Surface" field and choose Dirt (although you may want to look at the values listed here: surface=*#Unpaved, i think you probably mean to do "Compacted"), you shouldn't ever make a new road overtop of an existing one. |