emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137221511 | Hi, This already existed here: node/5773247036 so I removed the duplicate |
|
| 137114192 | Hi, You accidentally removed highway=trunk from way/611256838/history, effectively deleting it from the map. I fixed it for you, but please be more careful in the future, thanks! |
|
| 137072337 | Hey there, Thanks a lot for updating Marquette! Wanted to clear up a couple confusing things from this changeset so you know what to do in the future. First, with street crossings, there needs to be a line connecting the sidewalk to the street, and the crossing point goes where that line connects with the street, for example like this: osm.org/edit#map=19/46.54315/-87.39289 Also, I reverted the parts of Washington and Front back to primary. One of the important parts of road classification is that there can't be any "spurs" where a higher importance road like a Primary road ends at a lower priority road, it needs to end at the same level or higher. So if you think that Washington and Front are better classified as tertiary, you need to change them all the way to US 41. (I'm not sure they should be tertiary, since it's the main road through the downtown area, they'd most likely be primary or secondary) Hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions! |
|
| 137063161 | Thanks for the additions to the map, however, the description tag is not meant to be used for advertising, see description=*?uselang=en#No_advertising for more information. Would you please remove the description tags from these businesses? Thanks! |
|
| 137027147 | Hi, Thanks for the changeset, when you're adding crossings, you need to make sure they don't overlap with already existing sidewalks or crossings. For example, your crossing here: osm.org/edit?way=1180062325#map=20/42.78568/-86.10439 overlaps with the sidewalk, that's why the dashes are a different color. Could you go back and fix those to make sure that nothing is overlapping? Thanks! |
|
| 137011768 | Hi, Did you mean for this building to have two street names? way/900810576 |
|
| 136939041 | Hi, You created way/1178791935 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
|
| 136849682 | Thanks! Tagging the football field as access=private would be the correct value, access=official is sort of a misnomer and isn't widely used, see access=official for more information |
|
| 136990372 | Never delete other people's work, modify the existing objects instead. See osm.wiki/Keep_the_history for more information. It's considered rude to outright delete an entire golf course and then re-draw it basically the same way, especially since you didn't re-add features like the fairway multipolygons. |
|
| 136988600 | Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in changeset/136990372 |
|
| 136988799 | Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in changeset/136990372 |
|
| 136955184 | Reported for spam |
|
| 136885113 | Hi, You created way/1178452585 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
|
| 136917396 | Hi, Can you please explain more about what this is supposed to be? Thanks! |
|
| 136795965 | Hm, yeah there's not really a great tag for that, i guess we'll just leave it as is |
|
| 136849682 | Also, you added access=official on way/594239780, which doesn't really make sense. Could you explain what you were trying to do with this tag? |
|
| 136848523 | Hi, Abbreviations of names and street addresses are incorrect, could you please expand them to their full name? Thanks! |
|
| 136849682 | Hi, You added way/1178210539 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
|
| 136852673 | Hi, You added way/1178248789
with no tags. Could you please go back and tag them? Thanks! |
|
| 136837902 | Also this relation is now broken relation/15010848#map=19/46.30354/-87.03294 |