Hi,

This changeset moved a power pole far away from the correct position, see: osm.org/edit?node=3735079426#map=16/43.9516/-83.9063

Can you please fix it? Thanks!

Hi,

You updated the number of lanes, but did not update the "turn:lanes" tag to only have one value. Can you please do that? Thanks!

Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1174846252

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: way/1174932475

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!

and also here: relation/15881376#map=19/43.96570/-103.35020

Hi,

You seem to have broken the Central Pennington boundary by leaving an open part here: relation/15881376#map=17/44.05759/-103.17124

Could you please fix that? Thanks

Please double-check your edits in the future, you made an entire stretch of Washtenaw Avenue unroutable because you forgot to remove the oneway=yes

Hi,

Thanks for your edits, however I'm going to be reverting this as there are several errors and inaccuracies with it:

1. You added two motorway_link ways as basically a separate turn lane when there's no physical separation, which is not allowed.
2. There's six different traffic lights, so routers would apply incorrect penalties for stopping
3. The destination, destination:ref, and destination:street values are inconsistent and some of them are wrong.
4. The primary/secondary road switch is now in the wrong place because it doesn't connect to a motorway link.

I don't know exactly what it was like before this change, so it might still need to be fixed, but please double check to make sure that what you're doing is a correct way to map. Thanks!

(reverted in changeset/136120750)

The map clearly states its a private driveway, so if someone cant read the map and is trespassing on your property, then thats something the police need to deal with. OpenStreetMap is meant to be a open map of the whole world, including driveways. I dont care if your driveway is there or not, but eventually someone will re-add it, and if you get into a back and forth edit war with them, youll be the one who is banned for deleting correct data, unfortunately, as its considered a form of vandalism (osm.wiki/Vandalism).
So again, if someone incorrectly thinks that your driveway is public when the map clearly shows it isnt, then thats something law enforcement will need to deal with, thats not really something we can control

Yeah, there's really no point in deleting, someone else will just re-add it eventually. It's marked as private, so apps and consumers understand it isn't for public use.

I agree, but you added a node with the role 'label' to the relation, which is something you can't do with a multipolygon, only with a boundary relation. So i wasn't sure if you meant it to be a boundary because you added a label, or if you accidentally added a label to a multipolygon

Hi,

Did you mean for relation/15842899/history to be a type=boundary instead of a type=multipolygon?

Hi,

Can you please give me your source for marking this as a park and ride? I do not see any signage in street view imagery to show that this is a park and ride lot

Hi,

Looks like you didn't add a conditional restriction to "maxweight:hgv:conditional". Could you please fix that? Thanks!

you sure? There's barriers at either end visible on all satellite imagery, as recently as mid 2022 (and also mapped). I would be surprised if a public tertiary road has barriers restricting access on other side, so I assumed it was blocked off for construction.

Per the 2021 highway guidelines, tertiary roads should end by connecting to another highway of equal or greater importance, both of these roads did not do that. Since you're local, if there's a local guideline that supersedes the 2021 US guidelines, feel free to change them back to tertiary.

Hi,

I'm not sure that this Southfield Bike Route is correct. A bicycle route is one signed or numbered route, usually with one defined start and end point. This looks more like a cycle network, shown here: route=bicycle?uselang=en#Cycling_network

Could you please see if that is a better way to tag this relation? Thanks!

Hi,

You created way/1168792087 which has the exact same geometry as way/1168772431#map=15/44.0937/-97.1432, could you please fix that? Thanks!

Hi,

I think you mistakenly made this way a crossing: way/1016954430

Could you fix it please? Thanks!

(sorry, i was trying to create a bug report for rapid, but https://github.com/facebook/Rapid/issues/690 already exists)