when you say the source here is "Street view", do you mean Google Street View?

The issue is that the changesets don't mention this- they just say "inspiration :)" as a source. National boundaries are sensitive objects and people can be upset when they're modified. The issue is (as it always has been) that if there's a process to correct them that it should be explained on the relevant changesets.

@Nankaner - I can assure you that both SomeoneElse and woodpeck were consulted before the 0-hour block was placed.

As jremillard said, all import must be vetted by the community according to the import process. I'm reverting this import now.

Also, which objects came from direct observation and which came from Google?

Can you prove that?

If so, we can complain to them about it.

I need to step in here and say that while I'm glad that the tempers have been calmed, that trolling and name calling are really inappropriate behavior, on everyone's part.

Please try to keep the comments relevant and reduce the pointing and name calling to a minimum.

I realize you're new, but I need to tell you that Google Street View is explicitly not allowed to be used as a source for data. It's against their terms and license.

Fortunately there's a project that's similar to Google Street View called Mapillary that allows us to use their data in this way, and you can even make your own street view data from it and use that.

Gerald, I was asked to intervene on this on behalf of the DWG, and I have read many of the changeset comments. At the same time, regarding *your* change- this is not a fence.

Gerald, the problem is it's not a fence, so just reverting isn't the right thing to do.

This is the same issue as before.

If you're fixing broken relations- that's great, but please explain that.

If you're modifying the boundaries to make them correct, please explain that.

Hi, Wecome to OSM. You're making a ton of edits to OSM. What's the source of all these stores?

I said that you're removing the tags- which is exactly what you said you're doing.

If you want to look at the indoor mapping pages, you might find something that works for you:
osm.wiki/Indoor_Mapping

I have no idea what that stadium has internally, but if they're walls, why not call them walls? Or were you indicating the lines on the roof?

I see two issues here:

First, you are removing the tags on the ways, rather than replacing them with something else.

Secondly, you are not using changeset comments. Please use changset comments on your changesets:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

You're making a lot of edits with a source of "inspiration"- is that your only source?

This is a pretty huge changeset- with hundreds of objects. Can you say a bit more about what you were doing?

Congrats on your first edit to OSM! Looks great!

Congratulations on your first edits to OSM!

Eurgene,

You're making huge numbers of massive changes. Please make meaningful changeset comments on these changes so that others can follow what you're doing.

peace2,

You keep making these large changesets with very obscure changeset comments? Can you please try to make more descriptive comments of what you're changing and why?