Hello ovaryaction

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case.

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or outdoor mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib

changeset/179103587

Hello ovaryaction

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case.

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or outdoor mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib

changeset/179103587

Hello NeisBot,

Some of deletions were correct and some were not. For the trails that actually have been decommissioned, destroyed, or may be faint I've instead marked them with the destroyed or abandoned lifecycle prefix. For trails that were improperly deleted I've restored the trail.

A helpful reference for trails in OpenStreetMap is:

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Cheers, eerib

Hello cwms16,

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap, by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

In your email I recommend including:

- Your Crown Lands File Number for the orienteering tenure in this specific location.
- Associated tenure paperwork showcasing your tenure in this specific location.
- A GPX file of your recent activity in this area.
- An explanation for why single track trails in this area are plainly visible in satellite imagery and why they are materially different than BC Hydro's access roads.
- An explanation for why the Strava Heatmap shows dirt bike activities along the trail.
- Any photos that you believe may help support your dispute.

Cheers, eerib

Hello Shinsplints,

I was able to confirm that the photos you included in your changeset description were AI edited.

The signage today:
https://imgur.com/a/ADPDusB

I have changed the name back to what I had it.

Yari na, eerib

Hello all,

There is a wiki page that speaks to OpenStreetMap policy on trail deletions and the rationale of why we keep unsanctioned and/or private trails..

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

My guess is that these trails are unsanctioned mountain bike trails. If that is the case then it would be appropriate to add the informal=yes tag to indicate that the trail is unsanctioned.

If the land owner has specifically put up signs or another form of communication that these specific trails are not to be used then it would be appropriate to add the access=no tag to indicate that the land owner wants no access of the trail.

Cheers, eerib

Revert changeset/177863952, 177863808, 177863316 - Vandalism & Deceit (AI edited photo)

changeset/177866248