done btw :) thanks for noticing!

aight! :)

what does poplar forest mean? if it is a forest, I can just change it to managed forest then :)

hi! I suppose you know that you are adding hostel points to a whole OpenStreetMap database, in such a way you created 4 points for the same hostel on the map which everyone can see, its unnecessary. I will leave only one point on the map and remove others.

And also feel free to add new info to a map in general, to make it even better! :)

hi, Вила Арсови is standing in corner of the field with no buildings there, is it the right position of it?

by the way, I just added several hundreds of houses in this neighbourhood, so the map should be much more detailed in nearest future (as soon as your maps will update) :))

hi Goran, the "home" point which you created here isn't your personal bookmark, but an addition to a OpenStreetMap (osm.org) open database which everyone who uses the map can see. I removed it and added the address of it to the house which is there. Feel free to contribute to OSM project with us, and make the maps even better! :)

слушай у меня чувство что тут во первых какой то баг рендера в f4map, например в streetsGL оно выглядит вот так, https://streets.gl/#55.79465,49.10302,23.50,122.50,495.76, как то ... нормальнее чтоли

Но при этом там прослеживается кусок рендера пирамидной формы, видимо тут влияет roof:shape=pyramidal в тэгах. Видимо раз так то мб и не нужны эти приблуды с building parts, снесу ка я их как ты глянешь))

Хм... интересно, и правда не оч, хотя вроде высоты норм проставлял тогда, седня постараюсь поправить!))

you too! :)

а понял, спасибо за ответ! :))

Добрый день, хотел узнать про way/1147121316 в Кронштадте, вы добавили строительную зону, но я не на одном спутнике в ОСМ, в том числе гугл или яндекс никакой зоны там не вижу, это какая то совсем свежая инфа по личному наблюдению? :)

hi! well I checked, but I can't see it on Bing imagery, among all images it's only seen on Mapbox, everywhere else it's just a field.

But the main reason - I've checked it personally two days ago while driving a bike - and this exact part which I removed wasn't accessible from the road above, for me it seemed that there is just a private field, cows were there.

And there was a fence, so it's not a path people can reliably use, and there is definitely no defined path there right now, even if there were no fence...

thanks for answer, got it! :)

hi, way/1194852190 that you added recently - noticed that there is no building there, checked personally, it's just a small pedestrian zone near parking, wanted to ask is it okay to remove it, and secondly - where the address Dorf 4 came from for this place, if there is no building there?

hi, noticed you added a lot of buildings in Plovdiv, some (many?) of them are just squares and don't represent a real geometry at all... plz be careful with adding things like that because other people will have to fix that later...

Examples: ways 496068498, 496068988

hi, can you plz explain, way/1189791636, why there is a grass on the road?.. there is no grass..

Thanks for commenting! Yep, I understand that, I tried only to pick those buildings which have either simple geometry and those which are seemed to be well estimated by AI, because there were a lot of garbage. And yes, I think there were some which were several buildings in one, so to say, but as I saw a cases of that in other places in a city, I decided that it's better to have such a "conjoined" building which still has real geometry of several really close buildings, instead of completely empty place on the map.

"do you dare to contradict official data" - sure, it is probably right in itself, what's *objectively wrong* is how they this data is used and positioned - in such a way that in a lot of cases give no helpful information of how to actually get to the building with this address, I mean someone's gotta be blind or something not to notice that, I don't really understand what you are trying to defend here, and "rightously" reverting my changesets which are just moving them to their building, where they should've been in the first place...

regarding second comment, ehhm, I have zero clue what you are talking about here, as you answered me in this first thread only after I asked you to do it here, you ignored me for almost 10 days there...

well, that's interesting, weird and hilarious in a way...

Firstly, well yeah, you kinda have to answer other people who are also committing to OSM if you want to have a productive collaboration and find solution of different problems, and not ignoring questions. Even DWG says that people should answer and explain themselves before taking any action against them.

Secondly, which community are you talking about when you are saying that "it's fine with it"? From what I saw, Telegram chat consist of like.. less than 10 active people who actually interact there, it's not like there are a lot of people committing to OSM here, and when the question was raised regarding those weird positioning of addresses, responses from different people were, quoting:
- "Yeah I don't like that either..."
- "not sure who had the bright idea to let address points hang "in the air"
- "it makes sense sometimes (like an empty land parcel where there's no physical feature to put the addr on), but most times it's annoying."
- "I like mapping the addresses as a point, but those are too close to the road, they should be over the middle point of the building"
- "features have addresses, so address points should be attached to features, imo"
There were no people who were saying that yeah those addresses make complete sense, lol.

And lastly, well, Bucharest in itself the only, how to say, sloppily mapped big city which I saw for now, starting from those addresses which are just floating in the air and often give 0 value to actual users who use this map, then there are just so many buildings which are completely missing in the center of the city, I'd expect that the capital city wouldn't have this, but here were are and nobody is really fixing it here. And then there is a hideous infestation of extremely incorrect mapping of every individual tree in many places in the city, which is just surreal, nobody does that, makes no sense.

And them I'm the traveller who visited you country and decided to make the map better, and here you are gatekeeping hard af. Well I don't live here, so I don't really care that much about the map in Romania, but you should really think twice about what you are doing, because no matter the amount of changesets, you with 40k have the same "rights" as me with 1k, and you are not "owning" the country here lol, I have the same option to report you and rollback your changes to my changesets.