What about this?:
- you remove the flickr link from streets that cannot be found on the linked flickr page
- for streets on flickr you change the link to the one of the image on flickr, e.g. like this image
https://www.flickr.com/photos/134902422@N04/46577314574

Many thanks Denis. I understand but it is not clear to me why almost every street is tagged with that link. Take for example this street (that I randomly picked as example):
way/466095309
It is tagged with the flicks link but there I cannot see any image for that street. This is what I mean, out of the flickr link it is not clear what the source is about, what info was taken from flickr or how to find an image of the particular street on flickr.

This should not be harsh. You added a lot and we all make mistakes.
However, I recently encountered several additions and when I go there to check them, I see they are not real. These additions also have no check_date and once I asked why the change was made I never got a reply.

I see that you added years ago this webpage as source reference:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/openstreetmap-albania/
What is this website a source for? I am asking because i see you added this page to almost all streets in and around Tirana but the website only shows some pictures. It does not contain any official map, info or satellite images or anything that could be a source for streets.

I was here today and there is no construction.
Maybe there is a plan, but OSM should only show what is visible/existing.

> I only connected unconnected ways to newly created constructions

But you did not check that these additions were real. The user you mentioned is a vandal, he changed administrative boundaries, even the position of Tirana's main river.
Please only add things you are sure they exist.
(For what you added there is not even a tender procedure started:)

And you added buildings and tagged it with check date 2024-08-26.

Springvale Endoscopy Centre Day Hospita in Tirana at a Balmoral Avenue?

What do you do? Have you ever been there? You cannot just add what you like, only the reality. The reality is it is under construction. Even the roof is not yet ready.

And you also changed the administrative boundary. Please stop that. The administrative boundaries have to be changed by the city council, you cannot just change them as you like.

Sorry, but you cannot change the rout of a river. The river flows completely different than how you mapped it.

Why did you make this change? You prolonged a street under construction but there is no construction yet (checked personally this Monday)
Please only map what you see live.

Please only map what you see in real life. You changed a vague plan (we are in Albania and in election times) and even the river. These changes can first be made when the river flows indeed differently and the roads are under construction.

You also write that you checked the community center's website. Can you please add its URL? I had a look and cannot find a website.

Why did you make this addition? The center is here:
way/460201113#map=18/41.316650/19.780977
not where you added it.
Please only edit things you verified being at the location.

Dear Bolero, why did you re-add a road that was digged away 2 weeks back? Have you been there recently? The Rruga Rruga Gjergj Legisi will be broken permanently and this is also in the construction plans of the Unaza Madhe.
Please only add things you verified being at the location.

Dear _Bolero_, is the SH75 really reopened? In mid July I was there and the road was blocked, workers told me not to be reopened before end of year. Here I read also that it is still not reopened and it will not be reopened the next 12 months at least as there are more problems with underground water:
https://pamfleti.net/english/aktualitet/pas-shembjes-qeveria-jep-43-mln-euro-shtese-per-rrugen-korce-erseke-i244369

> Das erklärt schon mal einiges. In Freiburg gibt es die Kombination jedenfalls nicht und es gehört zum guten Stil, sich an die lokalen Gepflogenheiten zu halten.

Wow!
Ich habe 13 Jahre in Freiburg gewohnt. Und "Trottoir" ist französisch, habe ich in FR nie gehört.
Und woher nehmen Sie das Recht zu sagen, was die "Gepflogenheiten" sind? Sind Sie mehr Freiburger als ich oder was? Wer definiert denn das?

Und wenn Sie doch in Freiburg sind, dann fahren Sie fix vorbei und ändern dass so wie sie denken, dass es richtig sei.

Ich fokussiere mich gerne auf Inhalte, nicht auf Formalien.

p.s. es heißt "Einiges" mit großem E. Das sind die Gepflogenheiten der dt. Sprache, wenn mich nicht alles täuscht.

> Das ist leider nicht richtig
Dann machen Sie es halt richtig. Diese Diskussion braucht mehr Zeit als es schnell mit ein paar Klicks zu ändern.
Auch verstehe Ihren Ansatz nicht - vorher hatte die Brücke keine Wikidata und in Wikidata konnte man die Brücke nicht auf OSM finden. Ich habe diese Infos hinzugefügt, das ist der Inhalt meiner Arbeit. Ob irgendwelche Pfeiler welche Rolle haben, das sind Formalien.
Wenn dir meine Arbeit nicht passt, dann nimm halt die Info wieder aus OSM und auch aus Wikidata. So wie ich es verstehe kann es ja nicht sein, dass es formal unsauber war. Anstatt es schnell zu ändern, muss man den Anderen erklären, was sie so alles "falsch" machen. Dafür hat man Freizeit übrig und die anderen ja auch, um Antworten zu schreiben.

Habe es nun geändert: ist nur noch in der Fläche, nicht mehr in der Relation. In Wikidata ist auch die Fläche referenziert.