dmgroom_ct's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 44976895 | It's not a mass edit. reach edit was individually made my me after viewing Bing imagery, looking at the error I was trying to fix, and then fixing it. The sort of problems fixed are: mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:
b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd highway. c) the 2 highways to be joined have nodes which are in the same position, but are not the same node, so routing is impossible d) rather than joining highway 1 to highway 2, the end of highway 1 is very close to, but not connected to highway 2. These problems are identifiable on the routing layer of OSM Inspector. Where I have been unsure of whether something shown on the layer is a error or not I have left it untouched. |
|
| 44950601 | mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:
b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd highway. c) the 2 highways to be joined have nodes which are in the same position, but are not the same node, so routing is impossible d) rather than joining highway 1 to highway 2, the end of highway 1 is very close to, but not connected to highway 2. these problems are identifiable on the routing layer of OSM Inspector |
|
| 44922248 | mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:
b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd highway. c) the 2 highways to be joined have nodes which are in the same position, but are not the same node, so routing is impossible d) rather than joining highway 1 to highway 2, the end of highway 1 is very close to, but not connected to highway 2. |
|
| 40304344 | local CAMRA web site says this is now open |
|
| 41345000 | Is this really a bridleway? the road each side of the bridge is marked as tertiary |
|
| 42164903 | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
|
| 42164847 | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
|
| 42164879 | its not clear is this residential road should be connected to Padre Burgos Pototanin Junction, currently it is not |
|
| 35901225 | source should have been marked as survey |