Hallo steamtrain25,
Diese Änderungen sehen gut aus!
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo steamtrain 25,
Da bin ich wieder :-). Seht gut aus, nur nog die Frage ob Track hier nicht Path sein soll?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo steamtrain25
Danke für deine Beitrage an OpenStreetmap. Ich habe mir das mal angeschaut und habe ein paar Tipps und Fragen.
--------------------
TIPP 1
Die Bing Bilder haben hier Schnee, so das ist für Wegen oft nicht hilfreich. Glücklich haben wir mehrere Bilder zur Verfügung. Recht im Bild kannst du die Layers selektieren. Die Esri World Imagery (Clarity Beta) Bilder sind viel besser hier.
Es lohnt sich oft erstmals zu schauen welche Bilder die besten sind für das zu erarbeiten Gebiet.
TIPP 2
Versuche die Luftbilder dann auch zu nützen, sicher wenn du kein GPX gemacht hast, aber eigentlich immer hilft das. Mit der GPX kann man dann die Bilder ausrichten, und die Bilder sind danach hilfreich für die kurvendetails usw. In die Berge muss man die Bilder für jede Teilstrecke neu ausrichten, weil der Aufnahmewinkel ein grosse Einfluss hat, und der Winkel ist oft nicht recht von oben.
TIPP 3
Versuche Elementen im Realität nicht verbunden sind auch nicht auf die Karte zu verbinden.
Hier hast du ein Knot der Brücke verbunden mit dem Fluss [1], im Realität berührt das Wasser die Brücke nicht, so auf die Karte soll das auch nicht verbunden sein.
Wenn es ein Furt wäre, dann wurden der Fluss und der Weg eine Knote gemeinsam haben, mit die Markierung ford=yes.
Dasselbe gilt hier [2] wo du den Waldrand verbunden hast mit der Weg.
-----------
Ist Track wirklich das beste? Wenn ich mich die Esri World Imagery (Clarity Beta) Luftbilder anschaue, dann seht es aus ob es vielleicht kein Track [3] ist aber ein Path [4]. Rechts unter, bei die Verbindung mit detr 417 ist es klar das es ein Track ist, aber das andere Teil ist nicht so klar.
Schau dir mal die beide Wiki Seiten an und entscheide was besser ist.
----------------
Ist es klar was ich meine?
Viel Spass bei der Kartografie.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
[1] node/5820414558
[2] node/5820411944
[3] highway=track
[4] highway=path

Hi zwis,
If I understand correctly, the buildings drawn on the map by you are not the actual buildings.
The point is that I have no clue what the actual buildings look like, and I have not planned going to Mollis any time soon to check. Therefore I cannot draw these buildings. I can only remove what is not there and mark the area as construction and for a survey, or at some point for drawing based on new imagery. This way it is at least clear to other mappers that the imagery currently available is outdated, and we can prevent the same thing happening over again :-).
If you are in the position to check them out, that would of course also be a good solution.
What do you think?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi zwis,
Thanks for getting back. No worries about that. I did some checking in between and found a photograph where it looked like the greenhouses were placed in an area where previous buildings were razed, as a temporary use of the are. Also the typical swiss 'Bauprofile' were visible for something new to be build at some point.
I propose to remove the buildings you added, and replace them by an area tagged as landuse=construction with a note and fixme tag explaining that construction has finished by now, but that a survey on location is required because the imagery is too old. What do you think about that solution?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi zwis,
Are you sure these buildings are actually here?
The DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery you used is from 2012-08-15 according to the vintage layer (available in JOSM editor). The Esri World Imagery and DigitalGlobe Premium imagery (which are typically more recent) show different buildings here.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi km2bp,
My proposed implementation is already corrected by another mapper. You can see the route relation here:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8493528
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Benno,
Thanks for getting back.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
I like benches more than parking spaces :-).
A few hints:
With surfaces like these you should try to map only the actual surface as you can see on the imagery, not completely fill up the area between the roads. Roads are drawn as lines and therefore are 0 m wide, they get their width by defining lanes and road type. Additional benefit of not drawing over the roads is that it is clearer to distinguish in the editor.
------------
You use the tag amenity=parking_space [1] which is for single spaces (1 car), but I think amenity=parking [2] is more applicable since that is meant for multiple places.
----------------------
For parking, especially in the city, specifying the parking fee is very relevant to most motorists. Check the wiki [2] for more relevant tags.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] amenity=parking%20space?uselang=en-GB
[2] amenity=parking

You can never have enough of them! Cheers, dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Benches are my favourite!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
These additions look good.
To make them even more valuable you can also add information like phone number and website for example.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
These changes look good!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Just like in other changesets you add a duplicate [1] here of a park which was already on the map 9 years ago [2]. Is that only because Parc La Grange should be spelled Parc Lagrange?
I seems you are wasting your time with these actions. If you don't clean up incorrect tagging but just put features on top the map will just become a big mess.
I can quickly revert these changes for you, if you supply me the correct name of the park.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/613902407
[2] way/35278455

Ich habe auch der tourism=alpine_hut Markierung entfernt bei die beiden Berghütten der SAC im Gebiet, weil auch geschlossen sind seit der Bergsturz.
changeset/61409318

Ich habe schon der name:nl verbessert :-).

Hi Elapsus,
"Fermata tram 10 per Bahnhofplatz" is not really relevant on this node. It has therefore been removed [1].
Cheers, dikkeknode
[1]changeset/61139815

Hi Kat,
This place was already on the map [1]. So I have removed the one you added.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] node/5456480438

Hi BokitoBrew,
Why did you use the ' ' in the name, what does it mean?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi BokitoBrew,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've had a look at your changes. My knowledge of French is limited but I assume Crete means ridge. Is this really the name of the path, or should this actually be mapped as a separate ridge [1]?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] natural=ridge