Hi,
One note on mapping from the chair, all of these cliffs are facing the wrong direction... That may not have been visible on 2014 Imagery, but in reality it is very visible I noticed yesterday.... :-). I'll update accordingly.
Cheers from Switzerland,
dikkeknodel

Danke für die Antwort, ich habe es korrigiert.
changeset/61356315
Ich kann die MAPS.ME Implementierung verstehen, weil sie fast oft für Restaurants uzw. gebraucht wird. Aber ein Name gibt man nur wenn etwas wirklich ein Name hat.
LG, dikkeknodel

Super, das seht gut aus :-). Danke fürs eintragen.
LG dikkeknodel

Mit MAPS.ME kann man nicht alles ganz gut machen. Ich arbeite selber meistens mit JOSM [1] aber dass ist ein bisschen schwierig für Anfänger. Du kannst mal iD editor versuchen [2], es gibt dafur auch eine Training (ich glaube man nennt es 'Walkthrough'. Der hat aber schon viel mehr Möglichkeiten als MAPS.ME. Wenn du mobil arbeiten möchtest, kannst du auch Vespucci versuchen [3].
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
[1] osm.wiki/JOSM
[2] osm.wiki/ID
[3] osm.wiki/Vespucci

Auch die zwei im Tessin habe ich geändert.
changeset/61347653

Ich habe die Brunnen im Leissigen geändert. Sehe hier:
changeset/61347595
Ist das so besser?

Ich weiss nicht genau wie das Hochladen im MAPS.ME functioniert, brauche selber OSMand auf Android. Dort funktioniert es so dass man selektieren kann welche Änderungen zusammen hochgeladen werden. Vielleicht geht das im MAPS.ME anders.

Hi km2bp,

Thank you for getting back. What you write is very clear, no need to worry about your english level.

I will be happy to make the changes to bring this to the current standard in Switzerland. I just need your confirmation of the following question.
Did you hike the complete 7 Gipfel Tour? So can I assume the trace you reference [1] is the exact route?
If yes, then that is sufficient information for me to upgrade this into a route relation as decribed in the wiki [2, 3].

Cheers,
dikkeknodel

[1] @km2bp/traces/2496973
[2] osm.wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork
[3] osm.wiki/Hiking#Tagging_walking_and_hiking_Route_Networks

I have restored the building:
changeset/61318699

Removed the duplicate:
changeset/61318626

I've removed the duplicate
changeset/61318552

changeset/61318463

I've made some updates: changeset/61318303

Actually, I used Digital Globe Standard imagery. Premium and Esri have snow here...

Actually, I used Digital Globe Standard imagery. Premium and Esri have snow here...

Actually, I used Digital Globe Standard imagery. Premium and Esri have snow here...

Maybe a tip for the track definition. The state of the track is defined by the track_type tag [1]. The tracks on this mountain also had this tag, for example [2] and [3] were tagged as grade4 and grade3, which is clearly not the right tagging, since they both have a decent gravel surface. A grade2 would fit much better. Maybe this is also the crux at the discussion about 'unmaintained' part of a track.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] tracktype=*
[2] way/151190293
[3] way/612219676

Hi Stretch Longfellow
I was also a bit puzzled what you mean by 'unmaintained track road', but after some searching on wiki.openstreetmap.org it seems that this is a term used by iD editor. I even found a request to change the name on iD's github [1], but apparently there is some interpretation difference regarding this. The wiki page on track [2], however, does not mention at all whether there should be maintenance or not. Additionally, this 'unmaintained' does not mean that nothing is done to maintain the track, but that maintenance may take a while because there is no-one explicitly responsible for the maintenance. So basically the person bothered (most?) by the fallen tree lying on the track gets rid of that three. The others, by foot or bike probably, will just step over. That there was no tree on this road does not mean, that if a tree would fall, it would be immediately cleared.
Anyway, in Switzerland it is common to tag these mainly agricultural/forestry roads in the mountains as highway=track. I will therefore change them back to track, based on my survey last Sunday and the imagery that is available.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4092
[2] highway=track

One other hint I just though of. It seems like this route is a round-trip, starting and finishing at the aerialway station. I would suggest to add the starting leg also to the end, because that part would also need to be walked. In that way also the statistics on distances and elevation match better to the actual situation.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Your welcome! Always happy to help out and share the knowledge that I gained, since it may be a steep learning curve for new contributors. At least that's how I experienced my own start with OSM, and I still learn new stuff regularly by viewing how others approach challenges and by asking questions, and reading the wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel