Hi WomoMap,
Thanks for getting back quickly.
I was concerned your only source was the 'official map'. If that official map has a copyright, you are not allowed to use that as input for OpenStreetMap.
If you see some discrepancy on the official map which you then check locally, or via the allowed imagery (currently DigitalGlobe/Esri/Bing etc.) then it is ok to update. In that case it is clearer if you do not mention any potentially copyrighted info.
Basically you are not allowed to use any other information than the explicitly allowed sources like de imagery by default available in JOSM and mentioned herer [1], and of course the information you gather by going to the location itself. Other information is only allowed if you have written consent, which then should also be publiced at the wiki [1].

So In this specific case there is no problem, since you were there yourself to check it.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources

Hi WomoMap,
What does official map mean? This question obviously relates to the other comments I sent in other changesets of yours. Who is the copyright owner of this official map, and do you have explicit written consent to be allowed to use it?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi WomoMap,
The source you describe here is explicitly not allowed because it violates copyright of Swisstopo [1].
I please stop using illegal sources for your edits, this makes OpenStreetMap liable for copyright infringement.
I will report the specific changesets for redaction to the Data Working Group [2], which will remove any edits that may infringe copyright.

Kind regards,
dikkeknodel
[1] osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Not-compatible_data_sources
[2] osm.wiki/Data_working_group

Hi WomoMap,
I noticed you added boedmeren.ch as the source for your edit. If I look at the website there is a copyright statement "© 2015 Stiftung Urwaldreservat Bödmeren". Do you have explicit written consent that you are allowed to use this data to enter into OpenStreetMap? If not, this is probably a copyright violation and the data needs to be removed.
Please read the wiki on copyright [1] and which sources are explicitly allowed and not allowed in Switzerland [2].
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] osm.wiki/Copyright
[2] osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Not-compatible_data_sources

Hallo Lezurex,
Dank für die Antwort. Du hast Recht, ich hab mir die gleiche Bilder angeschaut, aber nicht mit iD editor aber mit JOSM. JOSM hat die Bilder offenbar etwas anders ausgerichtet. Ich hatte erwartet das es für beide gleich war, aber leider nicht...
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo Lezurex,
Weil du ein Review gefragt hast hab ich mir deine Änderungen angeschaut.
Ich sehe du hast der Type des Gebäudes angepasst, das verstehe ich und fügt auch Detail zu.
Ich sehe du hast auch die Form des Gebäudes angepasst, in [1] ist es visualisiert. Ich verstehe aber nicht warum, weil es auf die Luftbilder im alten Form besser passt. Ist dass vielleicht aus Versehen passiert?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60997353

Hallo BAK365,
Ich habe die Änderungen gemacht so wie du es vorgeschlagen hast [1]. Weil es ein MAPS.ME Änderung war, erwarte ich nicht dass Ninovui noch antwortet. Wenn ich jedoch Antwort bekomme, dann würde ich die Haltestelle besser positionieren.
Vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Ich mag auch deine Methode für Kupplungen einblenden, und kopiere sie gerne :-)
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
[1] changeset/61014918

Hi ydrgbjo,
To my opinion the tagging of SelfishSeahorse is much more accurate than amenity=fountain. From the photograph it is clear that this is a playground and it is a toy for kids to play with. The argument you make about 'inexistant qualifier' is not very strong, because from that perspective there would not have been an OpenStreetMap in the first place. At the start of OSM there were no tags defined, so without defining new tags mapping could have never started. And still n a daily basis new tags are defined.
Your change actually looks more like tagging for the renderer [1], because it seems you don't want to loose that frountain pictogram from the map.

Cheers,
dikkeknodel

[1] osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Alta Via della Valle d'Aosta n. 1 route relation I mean... Strada Regionale 46 was only touched because a highway required splitting for the Alta Via.

Hallo BAK365,
Du hast recht, ich habe zu schnell die Änderungen durchgesetzt.
Ich hab es jetzt genauer angesehen auf http://didok.osm.ch/ und es seht aus als ob es dort gar keine Haltestelle (mehr?) gibt.
uic_ref=8581130 heist Courfaivre, gare in DIDOK und ist positioniert beim Bahnhof.
Der erste Version vom Haltestelle (aus der DIDOK import) war jedoch auch dort positioniert mit der Name "Courfaivre, gare-école".
Es seht aus als ob die Position der Haltestelle verschoben ist.
Soll ich die Haltestelle verschieben?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi Rogier,
A track is a highway mainly established for agricultural or forestry. I see further south that it's mapped as cycleway. See the different types of highway here:
highway=*
Based on what fits best to the actual road you can choose an option.
Each road type has its default acces rights, which you find here:
osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Switzerland
----------
The tracktype tag gives information about the type of track and is thus only relevant if the highway is tagged as track. This tag does not say anything about the type or smoothness of the surface:
tracktype=*
--------------
There is a separate smoothness=* and surface=* tag for that.
surface=*
smoothness=*
-----
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Rogier,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Switzerland.
The tag bicycle=yes is redundant on a highway=tertiary since that highway type already implies access right for bicycles.
I can hardly imagine a Garmin does not understand that. But if it's that stupid, the solution is not to tag all highway=tertiary roads with a bicycle=yes, but to get Garmin to make a better device.
Although it does no harm adding this tag, I consider this tagging for the renderer, which is what we try to avoid. Also see the wiki for more details:
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hallo asdf2,
Danke für die Antwort. Ich hoffe du hast ein schönen Ferien gehabt. Vielleicht gibt es jetzt wieder viel zu erarbeiten in OSM :-P.
Ich habe es schon korrigiert und die Daten sind jetzt korrekt wie der Mitarbeiter freitag_c es gemeint hat.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi Ninovui,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Updating an outdated Bus stop name can help a lot to find the bus schedule :-).
I noticed there was a typical error that often happens when using the MAPS.ME application to update a name.
Names can be added 'native language' of the place and in multiple (potentially foreign) languages. MAPS.ME typically only shows the latter because it's often foreigners that add names in their personal language to existing POI.
However, in this case the bus stop name has change, which should be in the local or native language.
In general the 'name' tag is shown to all others except people with a language preference in french.
What happened here is that you added the new name in the 'name:fr' tag, while the outdated name still remained in the 'name' tag.
I've already corrected in:
changeset/60954270
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Ah great, I see you did an update. Keep up the good work!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

You're welcome!
Actually I also learned a new word from you. I only knew Neophyte as a Dutch Hardcore music group in the 90's :-).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neophyte_(band)
Now I realise that it actually has a meaning. Thanks!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
P.S. I do not advice listening to their music though, it's from a dark past....

Hi Patric,
I think your change is not completely as you want it to be. The name and name:de tags differ and the place is still tagged as a hairdresser, although you linked to the website of a shop for prescription glasses.

Please have a look.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Martin,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap, the shared effort to make the best map of the world. I noticed you added a wilderness hut with in the name Hôtel. Since a wilderness hut is typically unmanned, while a hotel is not, it attracted my attention. See:
tourism=wilderness_hut
I also see that there is a Alpine hut with the same name on the map just 200 m to the north east:
node/4451360558
Might these two actually be the same thing? If yes, which position and tagging is the most accurate?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Oh btw, my apologies for writing in English. As an original Dutchie now living in Zürich, French is not really my strongest feature...

Hi Adalhelm,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing to this shared effort in Switzerland.
Since you tickmarked for a review I have looked at your changes. I think you did a good job continuing the road. It's not really well visible on the imagery so that is probably why it was still missing and why contributions from people with local knowledge are so valuable.
I also noticed you aligned the buildings. Please be aware that the satelite imagery is not always perfectly aligned (especially in the mountains it's dramatic because of perspective issues). I don't say anything is wrong here, just that you should be aware. A method to overcome this is making a gpx trace while wandering the area and using that to correct the imagery. Although the gps doesn't have decimeter accuracy either, it is often much better than the alignment of the imagery in the +/- 5m range if I'm not mistaken.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel