Hi Daniele,

I think you overdid your action a bit, since you also changed the Via Pianezza within the village of Bracchio to a path. On Esri imagery it is clearly visible that it's still a residential road there and at least a track for about 250 m into the forest. I think the previous v2 was accurate if you compare with the imagery.

Could you please have a look at the Esri imagery and combined with your survey knowledge correct it?

Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Zhangchun1979,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Switzerland.
I noticed you added a lot of Points of Interest (PoI), also in countries surrounding Switzerland, which only have names in Chinese language (tag name:zh). I can hardly believe that this is the case. Additionally, I saw you entered a guesthouse with an aparent date in the name, see:
node/5686460224
This triggers me to think that you are added information potentially only for your own. Are you aware that you are adding this information to a public database?

Additionally, many of the point you added are in the middle of the street, which seems incorrect.

Could you please have a look at your entries and see if any improvements are possible.

I'm looking forward to your reply.

Kind regards,
dikkeknodel

Haha, yes indeed. That's why I generally stick to hiking and cycling features, because I am familiar with them and leave horse riding and the like to others :-).

I noticed you also changed the other buildings. That's great, thank you!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi ti-lo,
I do not understand the fixme you added. Firstly it does not specify what should be fixed. Additionally, it seems to describe a rendering problem, not a problem with the map data.
Could you please explain?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

I've made changes in:
changeset/59762903

One of the only exceptions is the wheelchair=* tag, which is supposed to describe if something is accessible for wheelchair users.

Hi Haack70,
The tags foot=*, bicycle=*, horse=* etc. should be used for legal acces restrictions, not for suitability to use them. See the following wiki page:
access=*
There are different tags to be used for suitability. Horse riding suitability can be entered with horse_scale=*, you can read more on:
osm.wiki/Riding#horse_scale_describing_the_difficulty_of_the_way
Hiking difficulty uses sac_scale=*, Mountain bike difficulty uses mtb:scale=*
Keep up the happy mapping :-).
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Fabrice,
Thank you for the clarification. I've put that info into the node for other mappers that may have the same question:
changeset/59742993
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Böckli,

You changed the addr:street tag for one of the buildings, but not the neighbouring buildings. Should their streetname also be changed?

Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Fabrice,
I noticed you added a viewpoint. Thank you for adding info to OpenStreetMap.
You've added the name 1056m, this seems to be the elevation of the viewpoint, is that correct? There is a special tag for elevation, that would be ele=1056.
Do you agree that 1056 is not the name of the point, but the elevation?
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi 勝井美弥子
You have placed a restaurant a a place where there is a parking lot. I guess this is a mistake.

I did a search for il Ghiotto and it seems to be located in Rue Cité-Devant number 6, close to where you put the marker. At this place there is currently already a restaurant tagged. Their website does not work anymore.
I've have made corrections and additions in the following changeset:
changeset/59741703
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Haack70,
I'm contacting you about the following feature that you introduced with this changeset: way/451757219
You have entered access restrictions for ski, snowmobile and horse. I wonder what you source for these restrictions is, since there are no additional restrictions posted on location. So to my opinion the same restrictions apply as the cycling path to which this path should have been connected.
Can you elaborate on that?
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Alex,
The changeset looks good. I missed in the previous changeset that you did not delete the whole node, but did that here.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi melay,
You asked for a review of this changeset.
I think you did a good job in changing the opening times to match the syntax. Thanks for helping out.
Keep up the happy mapping.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hallo Simi,
Du hast eine Überprüfung gefragt für diese changeset, deswegen hab ich es mir angeschaut. Verstehe ich korrekt das es hier um eine Bauernhof geht das Neuhüsern heist, und dus hast den Knotenpunkt richtig aufs Hof gesetzt? Das ist dann eine Verbesserung.
Doch habe ich noch ein Vorschlag. Jetzt hat der Knotenpunkt den tag place=locality, es soll besser place=farm sein.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi Alex,
You requested a review of your changeset. I had a look, and everything looks fine.
Thanks for helping out with OSM and keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Bollizh,
This one also looks good! Thanks for taking the time to work out the bunkers!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Bollizh,
Since you flagged this as review_requested, I'll continue the conversation in this changeset.
I think you did a great job in clarifying the fort, you even defined the different types of bunkers! I don't even have a clue how to distinguish :-). Also it is good that you added the information board. I just have one remark, the board_type=information does not really give any more info, I would advise to change it to board_type=history.
Keep up the great work!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Peter,
Thanks for clearing up this issue :-). My apologies for being thorough in digging up the past, I am typically interested in the history of things and sensitive to keeping OSM as clear as possible from copyright violations.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel