OpenStreetMap
dikkeknodel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 19348178 | Hi Romolo, You have mentioned in as a note in the BI 15 relation that www.bicitalia.org should be consulted when changing the relation. Reading this in a relation that is 4 years old I would expect that the relation would be actively maintained by www.bicitalia.org. However, when I compare this relation's content with http://www.bicitalia.org/it/bicitalia/gli-itinerari-bicitalia/140-bi15-ciclovia-svizzera-mare then I can only conclude that there is no active maintenance since only 20% of the route is in the route relation after all these years. Do you agree that this note does not longer make sense and should be removed? Kind regards,
P.S. I bumped into this because I am planning to cycle the section Locarno - Mergozzo of the BI-15 in a few months. This section is not yet mapped in OSM. When I have cycled it I want to update the route relation with that information. |
|
| 58505471 | Hi captaininler, Danke für die Lösung der Stüfen fixme. Der war schon lange auf meine Liste, aber ich vergass ihm immer wenn ich in der Nähe war... Liebe Grüsse,
|
|
| 49216121 | Hallo biobuur,
|
|
| 50703976 | I've removed the name:es tag with
|
|
| 49216121 | Hallo biobuur,
Dieser gibt es schon seit 2009.
Diese hast du in 2017 zugefügt
Liebe Grüsse,
|
|
| 50703976 | Additionally, you have given a waterfall as Spanish name 'Cascada de suiza' (node/2489285776). If I am not mistaken this means 'Waterfall of Switzerland' which seems too generic to actually be the name of this specific waterfall in Spanish. I think this is also incorrect use of the name tag. Could you please explain what you meant to do? Cheers,
|
|
| 50703976 | Hi Olga, I see you have given the viewpoint (node/1988924281) a spanish name 'Vista de la cascada'. To my opinion that is actually a description, not a name, therefore I have moved your text into a description:es tag with changeset/58368381. Cheers,
|
|
| 58195488 | This was a reversal of changeset/29434881
|
|
| 29434881 | Since there was no reaction. I have removed the Züri z'Fuess relations with changeset/58195488. |
|
| 30513381 | Danke für die Erklärung, ich habe selber sicher auch gleiche alte Changesets :-). |
|
| 54992904 | Hallo Pudu,
|
|
| 57993964 | Indeed, something went wrong. I've restored the name.
|
|
| 30513381 | Hallo Pudu, Du hast relation/4835843 den Note 'Pt 1521 - Urzlenboden' gegeben. Was meint Pt 1521 hier, dass ist kein Name der Wegweiser habe ich gestern gesehen. Wenn ich den Wiki folge (osm.wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Recommended_tagging_2) dann soll die Route van der eine nach den andere Wegweiser mit Name laufen. Das soll dann vielleicht Wildspitz sein. Was denkst du? Liebe Grüsse, dikkeknodel |
|
| 48553831 | Vielen Dank für die Erklärung.
|
|
| 48553831 | Hallo d_berger, Du hast ein fixme tag zugefügt zur way/88523689. Aber was dort geschrieben ist, sagt nicht was repariert werden soll. Gehört diese Information vielleicht in eine note tag?
|
|
| 57499346 | Hi rusefkuma, Thank you for contributing to OSM in Switzerland. It is however pretty much a puzzle what you actually contributed. It would be very helpful if you would add a insightful comment to your changeset next time so other mappers in the area quickly understand what you did. Could you please elaborate on what you changed? Cheers, dikkeknodel |
|
| 29434881 | Hi domod, There is a high chance you don't know this anymore, since it was three years ago, but I'll give it a try. You've added the hiking route relations Züri z'Fuess in this changeset. I tried to find nr. 01 today in the city but did not find any signposts. Was it signposted when you added it, or did you copy it from the map supplied by the tourism office?
|
|
| 54992904 | Hallo Pudu,
|
|
| 51137877 | I've made a correction in the following changeset.
|
|
| 57358017 | Thank you, how about the stairway changeset comment?
|