Please reply or we'll have to remove the data.

I'm sorry, but parcel data does not belong into OSM:
osm.wiki/Parcel#Does_parcel_data_belong_in_OSM.3F
Another striking reason to exclude this dataset is that it is wrong at many places. Just one example: way/746380254 - clearly no grass

95 % or the National Parks and Forests in the nation are not tagged as leisure=park, so please ask yourself who is wrong.

Kind regards

Hi escallic,

many buildings are very ugly and malformed: e.g. way/623250157

When are you gonna fix them?

Kind regards

Have you manually checked all of these substations?

Changeset comments like this are an insult to all other mappers. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments !

Hi Adamant,

I am much in favor of your general cleanup work, but why have deleted the "park:type" here? It was the only way to detect the park type without doing string matching.

Best regards

You've create a duplicated building: way/733710060 on way/37943653
To save the camera I haven't deleted it.
Best regards

Have you checked for round buildings like silos (like way/619863521) which the Microsoft algorithm usually shreds?

osm.wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data

Do you wanted to create a multipolygon?

Yes, this was a mistake. Sorry!

Are you a paid mapper? If so, please disclose all of your affiliations.

Hi Metroh,

do you have a database of railway crossings? You are the only mapper I know who maps crossings without the railway line: node/6394276649/

Kind regards

Was ist mit dem Duplikat way/226273670 ?

Your SEO spam was detected.

Please be careful with multipolygons: If you cause a hole, the whole area is not rendered anymore.

MapAnalyser, please respond.

Hi bjnlm,

you've dragged a node: node/5592238693
Should I fix this for you?

Question:
Why is there an outlier node inside relation/5595384 ?