OSMCha says "Irrelevant tags on highway", I suspect it's triggered by the addr:country which is really not necessary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106294098

Cool idea! I think Osmand may actually give a warning when encountering a "hazard".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107040361

If possible, choose a more detailed value from barrier=*
You could map who / what can still pass the barrier with access tags like "foot/bicycle=yes".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107228950

Maybe it would make sense to connect the parking entrance to the road using a short "highway=service"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107229355

Looks good to me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107232228

All's OK, but maybe the building outline could be squared. In ID and JOSM the key Q does this, in Vespucci it's a button with a right angle that looks a bit like an arrow.

I haven't tried Vespucci yet, it's definitely on my to-do list ;-) But for editing and QA of bigger areas, using a computer with keyboard may be more comfortable. JOSM and ID also have a lot of validation / QA checks included. E.g., I opened this area in ID and it complained about the driveway crossing the building (which was not changed in your edit). So it helps in finding such errors.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233057

Hi again Lee,
one tiny hint: you can make a way square with a button in Vespucci (and in the other editors). This is helpful mostly for buildings.

Crazy detailed mapping! Very cool!
But the website says "Havre de Pas" as addr:street? That's a bit strange, for routing I would also guess "Greve d'Azette" should be the address.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233630

Hi Lee, I'm following up on your request for reviews :-)

I'm impressed at the detailed tagging of those substations. Well done!
Since I'm not an expert on power mapping, I was looking at the wiki power=substation and maybe a "substation=*" tag could be added if you find out what kind of substation these are (minor_distribution?). Or might power=transformer fit even better for small installations?

Maybe for economy, you could just use one "source=survey", since all the facts come from your survey. Only if some tag has another source, that could be indicated with a separate source:x=y
Also, I think official_name is not needed since it's the same as the main "name".
But these things are a matter of taste (like much OSM tagging...)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107236548

Sometimes, like it was here, I'm panning across the map looking for open notes with simple enough issues to be closed without checking locally. I wouldn't look for fixme-tags this way, because I would need to download the data first (or use some QA tool like Osmose). Fixme's are maybe more useful for yourself and locals that way.

Photos are very helpful in many cases! I've looked at mapillary when available, and StreetComplete is also great with this option. Of course, often text is clear enough.

One-word notes mostly aren't very helpful... I like when notes give a bit more info than just "this POI doesn't exist", e.g., if there was a shop, what is in there now?

I also like to add infos like websites to POIs, but I don't like to google too much for such stuff.

"Review requested" is a great idea, which works best when there are other local mappers who can help the newbies. When I have time, I'll look into some of your "review_requested" changesets. But I'm sure you're doing fine :-)

You're welcome ;-)
I was only armchair mapping as well as I could... great that there are a few local mappers on Jersey to make sure the quality of the map stays high!

Bonjour camaralass, merci pour vos améliorations et ajouts!

C'est beaucoup mieux ce fois ;-)
Veuillez svp assurer que vous n'ajoutez pas à nouveau un bâtiment déjà existant. Il est préférable d'améliorer les lignes existantes. T'as aussi oublié "building=yes" quelque fois.
Continuez svp, il y a beaucoup à faire :-)

Bonjour camaralass, et bienvenue à l'OSM! Svp veuillez ne donner que des choses qui existent dans la réalité. C'est ce que vous avez fait dans les derniers changesets. Je vais annuler cette modification ici.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100099301

Hi Söm4324, danke für die Arbeit an den Hinweisen. Noch ein kleiner Tip:
das "building=yes" sollte noch gelöscht werden, sonst ist das Gebäude gleichzeitig vorhanden und abgerissen ;-)
Außerdem könntest du noch die Baustelle eintragen, von der die Note berichtet.
Merci, daganzdaanda

Hi,
für ehemalige Namen gibt es noch ein besseres Tag: old_name=*
Manchmal könnte auch "lokaler Name" loc_name=* gut passen, wenn z.B. viele Leute den Namen noch benutzen, obwohl er nicht mehr ausgeschildert ist.
Beides wird auf der Standard-Karte leider nicht gerendert, aber die Suchfunktion findet auch diese Namen.

Vom Luftbild her denke ich, dass es hier noch einige Wege zu erkunden und zu mappen gibt -- bleib bitte dran :-)

Ich habe die Wege jetzt mal so bearbeitet: changeset/95118475
Der südlichste Teil deines Weges war mit der Grenze verklebt. Damit das nicht passiert, müsstest du wahrscheinlich näher ran zoomen.

Die passendere Weg-Art ist wahrscheinlich der "Feld- und Waldweg" (track), zu finden unter "Nebenstraßen". Im Bereich "erlaubter Zugang" sollte man nur das nötigste eintragen, vor allem wenn irgendwelche Schilder da sind für Erlaubnis oder Verbot.

Hi, einen Weg auswählen, Shift drücken und auf den 2. Weg klicken, dann "C" drücken zum verbinden (oder Rechtsklick und dann das Plus im aufgeklappten Menu) ...

Hi, ich hab das gerade erledigt: changeset/95117514
Die Art des Weges und die Oberfläche hab ich so genommen, wie die Stücke davor und danach. Ist das OK? Ein Radweg in OpenStreetMap ist es eigentlich nur dann, wenn das blaue Radweg-Schild dran steht :-)