Great, that sounds alright then

Looks good.
Not really from this changeset, but you've got this bit of grass
way/907115273
mostly attached to the paths around it.
Opinions differ on whether this is best practice (personally I think that it should not be connected and should instead be accurately mapped to the outline of the grass, where possible).
But best to either have it all connected or all disconnected, rather than a mixture.

Thanks for adding this.
At the moment it's a dead end (which could well be accurate), but it also goes very close to Daffodil Drive and Redwing Close, but you haven't connected it to either of those. If there is connection then that should be added to aid routing.
Also, it was connected to the residential area, so I've disconnected it for you.

Looks good

Mostly good, you connected the path to the road, but had also connected the residential area and grass to the road. I've fixed that for you here.

Looks good. You mention in the changeset description that these are tarmac. That detail can be added to the path, under surface ("asphalt" is used for tarmac).

Hi, quite minor, but you have the path connected to the fence here:
node/8370801609
I assume that the fence continues south east for a short distance (right click the point, continue line).
Then add the appropriate feature where the path and fence cross (gate or whatever), see here for options: barrier=*#Access_control_on_highways_.28e.g._for_blocking_a_path_or_road.29

This edit was good, but shortly afterwards you added another bit of grass that overlaps this. These should be merged (select both, right click, merge).

Similar to a previous one, you've left the construction=residential tag on this, which should be removed now that it's complete.

Your tag for "basin" of "stormwater" isn't listed on the wiki
basin=*?uselang=en-GB
But has been used about 600 times in the UK, so maybe the wiki needs updating with a description of what's meany by this.
I don't know anything about this pond, so don't know if any of those three tags listed (which make up 92% of usage) would be suitable.

Does this path meet the bridleway at all before its eastern end?
It seems a little odd that they run very close and parallel for several hundred metres, or is there something between them?

On this one, you've left this bit:
way/750300811
as a service road, I think it should be a residential road too, as it seems to be going through houses and connecting other residential roads together.
(Perhaps these last few changes could have been in one changeset, updating the names of several roads.)

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good too

Looks good

Looks good. Best to remove the "construction=residential" tag as well as changing the highway value.

Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me.
I agree that a different, named road leading to houses should be residential, not driveway.

Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Similar to the one before, this still has the construction tag set as residential, and that should be removed whether or not you leave this as service.