Should read "Add unit to maxspeed"

Hello, thanks for adding this. However, note that we need to include "mph" in the value. So it should be "20 mph", not just "20". I've fixed these, but just to let you know going forward.

Thank you, I have now been able to update it

Hello, I was wondering why the speed limit had changed here, as the tags were not matching. However your description does not help anyone know why you made the change

Can you check way/31060964/history
You added maxspeed=20 mph and source:maxspeed=GB:nsl_single (implying 60 mph)
The connecting roads are both 60 mph so I am not sure to change anything
Thanks

I have surveyed the location and added conditional access tagging, as anyone can go through at certain times, and no-one (other than emergency services and those with permits) at other times. So I think access:delivery=no is wrong

You may want to review the use of access:delivery=no on
node/292217732 now that I have updated the access tagging

See changeset/145000121 I have already commented, thank you

Thanks for fixing this, and sorry for changing the name in the first place, I should have spotted that name was not very sensible. Moving it to official name is good though, because then it won't get picked up again

I've just noticed this, but what you did and what you said you did are not at all the same.

You made it so that way/400750666 was no longer a school, so I have now fixed that.

You didn't edit any roads here however

See note/4012784
Can this be changed to shop=convenience?

You may have opposed the change, but there was an approved proposal for the change to emergency=water_rescue
osm.wiki/Proposal:Emergency=water_rescue

Thank you, I've opened note/4003342 just in case it gets forgotten about

Thank you, however Google StreetView MUST not be used as a source for any edits. Their terms are clear on that, so it is copyright violation. That change, at least, will need to be redacted.
note/3615142

Thank you, but now there are two number 44s next to each other, is that really how it is, or do the later numbers need changing too?

I don't know, why do you think it is?

Thank you for adding this, I have now added an area for the school and added some details to that as well.

I should have put in my changeset comment that I was checking https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ to fix postcodes.

This is well within TF9 3.. and the rest of TF9 2JQ is much further down the road, so it was a reasonable change based on that evidence. People and businesses frequently get postcodes wrong.

I have apparently misunderstood the accuracy of the NSUL data.

I can't say it's surprising that the OSM search shows this location for that postcode when this was the only object tagged with that postcode.

Also, your changeset comment is needlessly passive aggressive.

Sorry for the delay, there were some seemingly incorrect postcodes added here. I have now fixed them: changeset/144154120

The addition of the postcode was not me, but I have now fixed it