Dit voetpad en de paden erachter lijken nu openbaar, maar er staat wel een hek aan de straatkant. Op zijn minst is dit beperkt toegankelijk, op zijn meest ontoegankelijk.

This path doesn't seem to be connected to any other path.

Does anyone know why this stretch of forest is mapped as a playground rather than a forest? Perhaps there is some playground here or playing is allowed here, but it remains a forest doesn't it?

I know opinions diverge on the topic, but some of the paths that have been deleted to the wets of Pinnebeek do still exist. It may be true that forest rangers are trying to close off some of them and I have seen concentrations of chopped wood and branches on other such paths, but this is not the case for the paths to the west of Pinnebeek. In fact, the paths, as mapped on https://topomapviewer.ngi.be/?x=654391.90&y=665332.07&zoom=9&l=en&baseLayer=ngi.cartoweb.topo.be&baselayer=ngi.cartoweb.topo.be are correct.

Brug hier afgelosten. Dat zal te maken hebben met note #2830762 maar betekent ook dat het O-W-fietspad hier onderbroken is.

Deze doodlopende straat is deel van Kleine Heide.

I did not see a bench here. (The bench further up in NW direction is still there though.)

Because this road is set as access=destination it is not included in gps routes for pedestrians either. So, either the access should be adjusted or, and this may be better, the footpath on the soutside of the street should be mapped. The footpath is separated from the street (separated by hedges) and goes from the intersection to the east, to the start of the existing cobbled footpath on the west. It is not paved.

I know there are some discussions about roads being mapped as either "sett" or "cobbles", but this street is really made up of some proper cobbles that Paris-Roubaix organisers would be jealous of.