OpenStreetMap
clay_c's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 63548125 | The outlines for Haven Elementary School looks like it doesn't match the building. I suggest switching your background imagery to Mapbox Satellite (hit B in Edit mode) before you take another shot at the outline. The tagging looks great!
|
|
| 63677226 | Tagging looks complete! Though make sure to square the corners of the building outline. You can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode.
|
|
| 63512828 | Tagging looks good!
|
|
| 63542654 | The building outline looks a bit too big here too. Could you match it up with the building's exterior walls? Also, did you mean to delete the New Life International Church?
|
|
| 63523707 | Hi! The building outline you added looks like it's swallowed up the parking lots and some nearby grass. Could you make sure it follows the building's exterior walls?
|
|
| 63523707 | Hi! The building outline you added looks like it's swallowed up the parking lots and some nearby grass. Could you make sure it follows the building's exterior walls?
|
|
| 63523707 | Hi! The building outline you added looks like it's swallowed up the parking lots and some nearby grass. Could you make sure it follows the building's exterior walls?
|
|
| 63623354 | Hi rhoover! The tags you're adding are all helpful, though it seems that some of the building outlines you've edited have lost their `building=yes` tag. Could you go back and make sure they're all marked as buildings, and also that their names are properly capitalized?
|
|
| 63662878 | It looks like the building just next to this is marked as a post office. Could you verify which of these buildings is the post office? (Also, all post offices are operated by the United States Postal Service, but otherwise the tagging looks good and complete!)
|
|
| 63775495 | Good tagging, good outline!
|
|
| 63628825 | Uh oh! You actually had it right the first time. This is a school building, not school grounds. The operator tag looks good.
|
|
| 63628950 | Looks perfect!
|
|
| 63628573 | Good right angles on the outline. Though the building seems to be more J-shaped, hooking around the inner parking lot and pool. Tagging looks good.
|
|
| 61152757 | As for Texas Orthophoto, the server was mysteriously taken offline a few months ago. I guess the state government didn't want people using it. |
|
| 61152757 | I wrote a [diary entry](@clay_c/diary/42361) about this issue. Frontage roads in Texas are truly unique, and there's not really a "correct" way of mapping them, although I tend to map them on a continuum of `highway=trunk` when they function as continuous multi-lane thoroughfares with stoplights, to `highway=tertiary` or sometimes `highway=unclassified` when they're two-way rural frontage roads. Other mappers tend to care that frontage roads are tagged the same or higher than the surface road for which they serve as on- and offramps. So, segments of frontage roads connecting motorway_links to surface roads probably shouldn't be downgraded beyond that. |
|
| 63546502 | Good outline and tagging!
|
|
| 63546308 | Good outline, good tagging!
|
|
| 63546052 | Nice building outline and tagging! This kind of building is tricky to map. Think of it more like rowhouses, where you draw an outline for each individual home and connect them all to their neighbors. Likewise, each business in this strip mall deserves its own building outline. But since the CVS is all we're concerned about here, go ahead and make that one its own building outline and don't worry about the remainder of the building - You can leave that as a generic building=yes.
|
|
| 63524417 | Looks good!
|
|
| 63522793 | Hi! The tagging looks good and complete, although it looks like you accidentally put two building outlines on top of each other. Make sure to delete one of them to get full points.
|