OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
152971681

Why did you remove the boundary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152971681

152962791

You deleted a lot of roads in this changeset - did you mean to do that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152962791

152916510

highway=unclassified is fine for minor public roads. highway=residential should only be used for residential streets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152916510

152916422

Please use expanded street suffixes on OSM
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152916422

152903617

You should have the POI tags on either a point or the building outline, not both
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152903617

152873123

Welcome to OSM! You marked this as access=permissive, but it's probably access=yes seeing that it's a public park. What do you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152873123

152859070

No worries - thanks for doing the research! I have also moved the boundary outside of the school grounds since they were overlapping.

152859070

Are the soccer fields and parking lots part of the park as well? There's already an area for the park which includes the school, which is probably wrong.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152859070

152818952

You should only draw the parts that are still visible, not the parts that were completely removed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152818952

152736973

If so, maybe you could provide some evidence that it's actually there?

152744764

You have renamed an entire road to the business you were trying to advertise. I have reverted your edit

changeset/152749270

152706456

I reverted your fictional changes - please do not add fake features to OSM!

changeset/152736973

152716031

You set the website of a bus route to the website you are advertising. I have reverted this change

changeset/152736641

152734282

bicycle=private is implied by access=private, the tags are hierarchical
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152734282

152706456

While I wish this was true, I'm pretty sure Pflugerville doesn't actually have any plans for light rail. Can you provide some evidence that this evidence isn't totally made up?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152706456

152682319

=designated means that they are intended for that purpose, and usually signposted. It's like =yes but indicates the primary use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152682319

152646957

Welcome to OSM - please make sure that your changeset comment is more descriptive than "Added tags". Doesn't need to be long, but it should describe the edits you are making. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152646957

152652398

I have reverted your deletions - I'd be happy to answer questions you have, and explain further

changeset/152652790

152652398

These were already correctly marked as private before you deleted them - if you remove them, someone might end up adding them back without marking them as private, which I assume you don't want. If the driveways are physically present (which they are, I can see them from aerial imagery), then they should not be deleted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152652398

152521751

I reverted your edits because you are adding fictional features to the map.

changeset/152605987