citrula's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 150052966 | Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!
|
|
| 150005475 | looks good to me!
|
|
| 149968616 | You can press "Q" to square corners of objects in iD.
|
|
| 149944688 | I reverted this changeset because they added nonexistent roads. These were completely destroyed when the interchange was built as described in your description - they aren't appropriate for OSM. Please consider contributing these to OHM if that interests you. |
|
| 149941492 | abandoned:* namespace is not suitable for all features that used to exist. It's meant for features which are still present, but have fallen into disrepair. Mapping historical roads is better suited for OHM
|
|
| 149936605 | Welcome to OSM. Maybe I could help if you describe what needed to be fixed about the parking lot - in this edit you removed highway=service from one of the service roads, which isn't correct.
|
|
| 58594740 | How did you get the boundaries for the Reed parks? |
|
| 149925376 | I added the noexit=yes to the old bell alignment based off of aerial imagery, but I haven't been over there in a while. Is it connected to the new alignment or a sidewalk now?
|
|
| 149880853 | I reverted this change because you added address tags to the roadway and renamed it "Hat Party", and then removed the name. I assume this was a mistake, let me know if you'd like some help making the change you intended! |
|
| 149887182 | looks good to me. Thanks for your contribution!
|
|
| 149443468 | Please remember to expand the suffix of the road names!
|
|
| 149443468 | Please remember to expand the suffix of the road names!
|
|
| 149846660 | Go for it! Happy to answer any questions you may have |
|
| 149846660 | Tennis courts should be mapped separately, and footways should be connected to the main road network for routing. Otherwise, this edit looks good to me.
|
|
| 149846404 | You can press "Q" to square objects with iD. Also, building=detached is used for single-family homes on OSM, building=house is more generic (but still correct). Happy mapping!
|
|
| 149842595 | Welcome to OSM. If these trails are private, deleting them is not the correct solution - someone will just add them back anyways (because they assume that they are missing). Instead, we can add additional access tags which indicate that the trails are private access. I will probably do this in the next few days. See also:
Let me know if you have any questions ! |
|
| 149495848 | I removed barrier=gate from the road way - it should only go on the node where the gate is actually present
|
|
| 149773814 | I reverted this edit because you added the tags for your business to the road. Please add a separate node at the location of your business instead, thanks. |
|
| 122585270 | What is "The Ghost House" ? |
|
| 149676558 | Please don't add proposed features - wait until they are actually present to map them :)
|