Thanks for your response. I'm familiar with the check_date tag, I just haven't seen it being used in such a way (adding an older date). Are you using this for BTCMap in some way? I'm curious how you determine whether the user actually surveyed its existence or not? For example, on this POI node/7056211216 , check_date was set to 2023-03-17, and the changeset from that date was someone doing tag cleanup with Osmose - almost certainly not a survey.

The highway=crossing nodes are not indicating the existence of a traffic signal. They show where there is a signalized pedestrian crossing. I added them back
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147024976

Press "Q" to square corners of objects in iD! :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146989054

I have removed this railway as it is not present at all.

changeset/146998494

Can you explain what "bump check date" means? Where is the information for when it is last checked coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146982053

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your contributions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146986510

Some of these (for example, the football pitch at the high school) seem to still exist. Can you explain why?

You deleted a lot of objects in this changeset. Was that intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146968116

Please use changeset comments! :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146964475

On OSM we map what's on the ground, and to me it seems like this is not present at all today. If you want to map historical routes, I recommend checking out OpenHistoricalMap. They are working on a new map layer for rail which might be of interest to you.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913145

building=* areas should match the footprint of the building. Also, please press "Q" to square corners of areas as needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146875961

I fixed this.

Definitely appreciate adding the parks! The tagging schema is kind of lacking for that sort of partially developed public spaces like this. Happy mapping!

Please be more careful drawing building outlines, and press "q" to square corners of objects you draw in iD.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146842839

This doesn't match the opening_hours syntax. You can use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to create opening_hours values easily!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146824081

leisure=park has a pretty narrow definition, which differs from what we call "parks" in the US. It implies manicured public space. Many "parks" in the US are better tagged as nature reserves on OSM.
From the wiki page on leisure=park:
"This tag is intended for (usually urban) parks with managed greenery, located within settlements and nearly always open to general public [...] They are largely a human-sculpted landscape."
leisure=park

For the sidewalks, you should mark the portion of the way that is crossing the street as highway=footway + footway=crossing. See the wiki for some helpful diagrams: footway=crossing . iD editor will have a tagging preset for this as well, but I don't remember what it's called. Let me know if you have any questions !
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146763922

When elements can be mapped as a node or an area (like parks) you should only have one. I combined the old node onto your new park boundary in this changeset: changeset/146767636
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764599

If it's a preserve, consider changing it to a leisure=nature_reserve. See the wiki: leisure=nature_reserve
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764485

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your contribution
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764557