Please don't use descriptive names!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141728971

Please don't use descriptive names. It is sufficient to add the sport=pickleball tag like you already have
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141729392

Hello, I have reverted this changeset because it is clearly visible from aerial imagery that this is a school and not a park.

changeset/141750683

Thanks for working to update this! Please don't use descriptive names like "Salt Water Fishing", instead you can put this information in a description tag if you think it is relevant. (I am assuming that these places aren't actually named that)

Are there other people involved or is a project you are undertaking alone? Do people use or refer to this route? I'm not sure that this is appropriate for OSM as it stands currently.

Are there other people involved or is a project you are undertaking alone? Do people use or refer to this route? I'm not sure that this is appropriate for OSM as it stands currently.

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141531409

You can press "Q" to square the corners of objects in iD :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141517669

Welcome to OSM! If a POI is misplaced, it is better to move it to the correct position if possible rather than deleting and recreating it. This keeps the history intact and helps future editors.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141517328

The map board looks pretty new so the access rules might have changed recently.

At each of the trailheads there is a map which indicates the trails are residents only. The park itself is owned and managed by the city of Austin, but the trails are on a greenbelt which I believe is owned by the HOA.

Where can I read about the "Atlantic Way Trail" you describe? Are these route relations something related to that or are they defined elsewhere?

Hello,
How did you choose whether to add bicycle=designated to ways? I have a particular question about way/562379216/ , which is marked as 'designated' without any signage indicating such, and would be quite hard to bike down

Hi scotttie, you need to add the appropriate highway tag to this way. I'm not familiar with this trail so I will leave it up to you to determine which one is appropriate (footway/path)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141403432

You can press "Q" in iD in order to square the corners of things you draw :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141402011

Welcome to OSM! You don't need to add oneway=no to streets which don't have a oneway tag. They are assumed to be two-way by default.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401921

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141406699

The tagging looks correct to me. Welcome back to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400264

You can read about what is compatible here:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility

Also, are you sure that tagging this entire area as under construction is appropriate? Looking at Bing imagery from this year, it appears that a lot of this is complete and in use already

Have you verified that the license of the LJA Engineering gis data is compatible with OSM?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141392148