Do you know what the license is for the speed limit data from Mapbox? I'm concerned that it isn't compatible with the OSM license.

You added the business to the entire building. Please add it as a single point at the approximate location in the building.

changeset/172720582

You didn't actually change any speed limit values in this changeset, it just bumped the version on a bunch of the ways. Can you tell us about your sources and the editor you are using?

What is "GOAT MAN"?

welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. natural=grassland is for naturally occurring grasslands - for maintained lawns like this consider using surface=grass

natural=grassland

Also, please don't draw a lot of tiny areas like this - it should be one object for each section of grass.

alt_name is used for a different name used to refer to this specific feature - I don't really think that applies here. Nobody says "Austin" when they are referring to Jollyville specifically. Austin is already represented well on OSM by this relation

relation/113314

these look more like highway=footway than highway=service. They aren't wide enough for a car

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. It looks like you have made a few edits where you added a name like "new italian resteraunt" - on OSM, we generally try not to use descriptive names like that. It's totally fine for an object to not have a name, even if it's just because you don't know it yet.

These don't really match up with the footpaths that are visible on imagery. If you switch to Bing imagery, it's much clearer.

using a descriptive name like "LJ Childcare Drive Through" is normally not desirable - I fixed this for you, and also marked only the section that goes under the awning as one-way based on the two-way markings on the north-south segment.

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. On OSM, tagging needs to follow a particular format for data consumers to be able to use them. You can read about it on the wiki
osm.wiki/

In this particular case your "Made by" should be replaced by

manufacturer=Flock Safety
manufacturer:wikidata=Q108485435

we also don't normally explicitly document unknown information like this - that is implied by the absence of a key.

Let me know if you have any questions

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The ALPR node should be in the physical location, not in the middle of the road. You can right click the node and select the "extract" option to remove it from the road and move it.

Let me know if you need help doing this!

welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Please don't add descriptive names like "3207 Whitehall" - that information is already present with the address tags

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The ALPR node should be in the physical location, not in the middle of the road. You can right click the node and select the "extract" option to remove it from the road.

Let me know if you need help doing this!

If the building is still present you should remove the store information but keep the building outline.

please don't use descriptive names like "Grassy area" - not every object needs a name!

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

That's cool. Please note that using Google streetview is not permissible for OSM contributions. osm.wiki/Google

There are a variety of streetlevel imagery sources which are permissible to use in iD, but sadly I think most of the coverage will be from before widespread Flock adoption.

what source did you use to locate these ALPRs?

Welcome to OSM. You dragged part of a sidewalk across an intersection - I fixed that for you

don't think so - turning left at that entrance works fine in OSRM now.