citrula's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 154022228 | Please don't use google maps as a source for your edits
|
|
| 153944710 | Leaving them as highway=service is sufficient. It's implied that they aren't a part of the main road network from that alone |
|
| 153937640 | welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions.
Let me know if you have any other questions. Happy mapping! |
|
| 153944710 | Also, bicycle=no means that nobody is allowed to bike on these roads - including the residents !
|
|
| 153944710 | access=private should only be used if there's physical restriction (like a gate) or a sign which says something like "residents only" or "no trespassing" - is that the case here?
|
|
| 152198871 | Confirmed today, there aren't any bridges in Westside preserve 👍 |
|
| 153815563 | I'm not sure that there is actually physical separation on the driveways - they should only be a single way
|
|
| 153815781 | I reverted your edits. Please don't remove random tags and make only one object for each feature. |
|
| 152198871 | Thanks for the fix. Next time I hike through, I will confirm the north one - I only walked across the southern crossing last time I was there. |
|
| 153733518 | Also, please don't delete and recreate objects - it's better to modify existing ones to preserve the history.
|
|
| 153733518 | Welcome to OSM! Please don't add future/planned objects - wait until they are present in real life :)
|
|
| 152198871 | I don't think there's any bridges in Westside preserve. Did you mean to add them (instead of fords?) |
|
| 153729365 | Did you mean to remove the residential area for "The Preserve" neighborhood?
|
|
| 153761532 | Welcome to OSM - Google Maps is not an acceptable source for edits. See: osm.wiki/Google
|
|
| 153723082 | Thanks for the fix!
|
|
| 153682976 | reverted |
|
| 153682976 | You dragged some motorway nodes around and marked a random service road as a highway=trunk toll=yes
|
|
| 153567634 | Tags on OSM are free-form. proposed:* tag prefix wiki page says the following: " Proposed features that are not visible on the ground should therefore only be mapped in exceptional cases and after a discussion with the relevant OSM community, lest they might be deleted for lack of verifiability." In general, proposed features are only mapped when it is certain that it will be there in the future, and the path is well-defined. Whether or not the trail was mapped by an organization has little bearing on this. |
|
| 153567634 | That one should not be there either - I just saw this one as it was coming through my changeset QA feeds. Reviewing changesets is a volunteer effort, so not every change is able to be scrutinized - if you disagree with the response given here I encourage you to post on the community forums for more visibility |
|
| 153569850 | Can you explain what the "Major Edit" you made here is, exactly? |