The map board looks pretty new so the access rules might have changed recently.

At each of the trailheads there is a map which indicates the trails are residents only. The park itself is owned and managed by the city of Austin, but the trails are on a greenbelt which I believe is owned by the HOA.

Where can I read about the "Atlantic Way Trail" you describe? Are these route relations something related to that or are they defined elsewhere?

Hello,
How did you choose whether to add bicycle=designated to ways? I have a particular question about way/562379216/ , which is marked as 'designated' without any signage indicating such, and would be quite hard to bike down

Hi scotttie, you need to add the appropriate highway tag to this way. I'm not familiar with this trail so I will leave it up to you to determine which one is appropriate (footway/path)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141403432

You can press "Q" in iD in order to square the corners of things you draw :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141402011

Welcome to OSM! You don't need to add oneway=no to streets which don't have a oneway tag. They are assumed to be two-way by default.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401921

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141406699

The tagging looks correct to me. Welcome back to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400264

You can read about what is compatible here:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility

Also, are you sure that tagging this entire area as under construction is appropriate? Looking at Bing imagery from this year, it appears that a lot of this is complete and in use already

Have you verified that the license of the LJA Engineering gis data is compatible with OSM?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141392148

Welcome to OSM!

thank you for the fix!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141368077

Hi Michael,
Welcome to OSM! There is no approval process for OSM, but community members like myself may review the entries. Several of the entries you put in do not match the format used on OSM, so I have corrected them. Please refer to the wiki to learn more. Additionally, I have removed the description tag. OSM is not a place to advertise your business and that sort of entry is not appropriate.

You can review my changes here:
changeset/141358018
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141357004

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141351162

Welcome to OSM? Do you accept customers at this location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141324953

Welcome to OSM? Do you accept customers at this location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141324953

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141321519

Welcome to OSM! Can you explain what you are trying to do with this changeset? I don't think that the service way should be named that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141294045

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141233677