Hey,
why did you remove the wikipedia tag from node/31531037 and change the wikidata tag to an invalid value?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
your Wikidata tag links to Wikipedia. I think you might have meant
wikipedia=fr:Communauté de communes Le Grand Charolais
wikidata=Q28496278
Am I correct with assumption there?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
ich denke, der hier für way/676471780#map=19/49.70684/8.32063 angegeben Wikipedia-Artikel ist wohl nicht ganz richtig.
Evtl. sollte es sich um "wikipedia=de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Osthofen#Leckzapfen" handeln?
CamelCaseNick

reverts #80297507

reverted in CS #80299488

Yes, I did. Thank You!

Hey,
you have added a wikidata tag to node/2788680420 here. The wikipedia, i.e. it's language should be marked here with the syntax wikipedia=[lang]:[article].
Would you please do that?
Thanks,
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
der Wikipedia-Artikel für die Dreifaltigkeitskapelle sollte ein de: als Prefix haben, wegen des Schemas wikipedia=[lang]:[article]. Außerdem sollte dann doch auch wikidata=Q15109870 zu der Kirche passen, oder?
CamelCaseNick

Ah, Thank You! That's a problem indeed.
As a route master always represents a single service, shouldn't this be a issue best suited to be fixed within Wikimedia? (Kartographer?)
And when we talk about the display at Commons: I think way/334165685 should not have those wikidata/-pedia tags.

Hey,
wikidata references should be on the thing that actually represents it. Isn't the route master as a transport line the set of the variations/directions of the routes? And a Q1067164 describes such thing, of which Q1094251 is an instance of?
I am asking, because I had found the route master to be best fitting and consistency should be considered important, and maybe you can share your reasons with me on this.
Thanks,
CamelCaseNick

Okay, habe das in CS #80216801 gemacht.

Der Wikidata-Eintrag existiert noch. Darf ich davon ausgehen, dass der hier nur aus Versehen gelöscht wurde?

Hey,
firstly, castle ruins should have ruins=yes additionally to historic=castle.
Secondly, you have removed a wikidata tag, which have seemed to match. Was that an accident?
CamelCaseNick

Okay, thanks. And I have removed the second Q in the wikidata id there. Just, to let you know, if you use JOSM's auto completion.

Hey,
you have used a source tag here. The value suggest, you have used Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia has a CC-BY-SA license, one cannot just it as a source.
CamelCaseNick

Hallo,
der hier verlinkte Wikipedia-Artikel an der Straße hat keine Sprachangabe nach dem Schema wikipedia=[lang]:[article]. Außerdem sollte an einer Straße der Wikipedia-Artikel dieser Straße sein, sowie an einer Brücke der Artikel zur Brücke.
Da Straßenabschnitt und Brücke getrennt hier sind, sollte der Artikel – wie er bereits ist – auch eig. nur an die Brücke.
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
you have added a brand:wikipedia tag here.
There are multiple wikipediae in each a different language at least six of them have an article with the name Canada Post. Would you please use the syntax brand:wikipedia=[lang]:[article] to clarify which you mean?
Thanks.
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
you have added a wikipedia tag here.
It does not follow the wikipedia=[lang]:[article_title] syntax, hence a data interpreter does not know the language in which the wikipedia the article may be found.
In this example, I assume it would be wikipedia=sr:Земунска синагога.
Am I right with that assumption?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
you have use a brand:wikipedia tag for way/94436671, but you did not specify the language with the common brand:wikipedia=language:article title syntax. Would you please change that?
CamelCaseNick

Oh, sorry, I thought before this changeset it wasn't there, but it was. So it wasn't you. I'm sorry for that. Still, if you know the language, I'd appreciate if you'd add it. Thanks.