All right, this is a good point, because in that case removing the node entirely will be okay. Thanks for this. I’ll also change the building type to make it a house, so that people won’t be confused by this situation.

Have you opened the Mapillary link in my changeset description? I linked to a picture which shows what the path looks like.

The path does an interesting set of curves and on some parts there are two paths running in parallel. Your changeset was undone because you changed that to redraw everything as a straight line, which is not the real situation.

I don’t want to discourage you because I know you certainly want to improve the map, but your recent edits aimed at mapping sidewalks and traffic islands across various places of Brussels contained a large number of mistakes, and the iD online editor encourages mappers to use incorrect tags, not to mention the problem of misaligned geometries. Please take some time to inspect how things are mapped nowadays, and make sure to understand the difference between landuse and surface, and how traffic islands are better mapped as a single continuous area instead of small areas attached to each other, and also how kerbs are drawn (kerbs are directional).

Next time: if you want to ask questions, please use direct messages instead of commenting on changesets.

Happy mapping.

"atm=yes" encore valable pour CBC Assurances ?

Merci, mais ne pas oublier que les zones de recontre ont une limitation de vitesse à 20 km/h. Il faut donc AUSSI changer les tags maxspeed et source:maxspeed, pour que les applications d'itinéraire envoient la bonne info.

Nous avons corrigé l'erreur.

Nous avons corrigé votre édition.

Hello,

I see you requested a review here.

You added a swimming pool in Guidford, England: way/1469782130 That looks like a private amenity in someone’s garden; it must rather be tagged as "access=private" to avoid being presented to users looking for the nearest swimming pool.

Also, this giant building in Sudan does not like a building at all on aerial imagery.
way/1469782129

More generally, please make sure to upload your changes separately. When you map items in the UK, please upload them *before* moving out to editing places elsewhere in the world, because this edit is now showing as a giant bounding boxes covering large parts of Europe and Africa.

Also, please make sure to write correct changeset titles. Nothing in this edits looks related to #SriLankaFloods2025.

Hello,
I understand what you wanted to do here. However, there were a few problems with the way you modified the map. Please do not write multiple address values on building outlines.
If there are several house numbers inside the same building, addresses must be written as single nodes.
Also, please do not trace buildings from distorted aerial imagery, only vector imagery should be used.
I fixed this edit, no further action is required here. Thanks.

Zone de rencontre en maintenant le 30 km/h n’est pas possible. Corrigez votre édition svp.

Hello.

Is this street one-way just for cars or one-way for *everyone*? Your edit suggests cyclists are NOT allowed to ride against the direction of motor traffic, which is very rare in Brussels.

Panneaux M2 visibles ici
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1522200912221477

Nous avons corrigé : ajout du tag "oneway:bicycle=no".

Merci pour l’ajout.

Votre changement indique que le sens unique s’applique pour tout le monde y compris pour les cyclistes.

Donc, pas de panneaux M2, c'est bien ça ? Si c’est une erreur, nous pouvons vous aider à corriger.

Why did you erase Raphael’s excellent work to map cycleways separately here? (Which was been revised 2 months ago according to the latest situation, which differs from what UrbIS imagery shows.)

Merging cycleways and footways may be acceptable in the countryside but it looks like you are bringing us 10 years back in time.

Getting pedestrian navigation to route until the centre point of the intersection here (node/13476624845) looks even more absurd, given than we have mapped footways and crossing in great detail. Looks like a confusion between the difference between pedestrians and cyclists.

Is that a new convention? Did you discuss this way of mapping with other mappers?

Thanks in advance.

I did not complain about the bilingual name—this part of the change is okay, and it is good news that Cambio finally updated the name of some stations on their website, because in the past we had a problem when they used monolingual names for some of their stations.

As you can see, I solely wrote about the improper use of "Cambio" inside the station’s name. The revert was solely to fix that.

Please do not change the names of car-sharing station.

In particular, please do *not* add "Cambio" as part of the main name, and do not use addr:* tags on them. Thanks.

Hello, DCools.

I think there is a problem with this edit, because you added the two Ichtegem Melkerij stops in the same relation (towards Torhout Station).

node/2280073872
node/2280073867

Also, you did not add the role to the objects and you put Ichtegem Melkerij… at the end of the list, just after Torhout Station, as if Ichtegem Melkerij was served last. This does not make sense to me, and now this line is invalid and will disappear from apps.

Thanks.

!!! SVP ne pas toucher au métro avec l'éditeur iD.
Grosses erreurs dans ce changeset. Je reverte les géométries.

Hello,

Can you please explain how "Kilometerhok E41541" relates to what you are doing here?

You are often using cryptic changeset titles or re-using the same title for several—usually unrelated—changes, like this one which you used no less than 25 times in the past 3 days.

Can we please insist again that you start writing real changeset titles that correctly describe the intent of how you want to change the map?

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Can you please review the shape of the building you have just added here: way/1467099269

It looks like you are tracing from… aerial pictures instead of using the GRB vector basemap, resulting in houses away from their real locations.

Thanks.

I think there is something wrong with this edit.

This forest path in Sweden: way/33146743/history

This building in France: way/122846267/history

This street in Sacramento, California:
way/10500786/history

… are all part of your bulk name change, and they are probably incorrect, because it looks like your edit was aimed at changing names on Indonesian roads.

Please review this edit. At least those 3 objects should be reverted to their previous state.

Hello,

I see you wanted a review.

A good point for providing a clear description of what you edited, thanks for this.

Same comment as changeset/177192782 : Your edit clearly does two completely different things, and on locations several hundreds kilometers apart. Please never do this as a single upload. There is no magic system that will split it in two parts; if you ask for one single upload, then you will have one single upload. Which is now showing as a huge rectangle on the map. This giant changeset is very annoying because it covers most of Belgium and even spans across neighbouring countries.

Also, you might want to know that buildings should never be traced from aerial imagery. You damaged a few buildings in Terneuzen, despite those buildings were clearly labelled as having been imported from the BAG registry.

Buildings in the NL have tags like this.
ref:bag=0715100000033119
source=BAG
source:date=2014-03-24

Please never trace or redraw buildings on aerial imagery. Those pictures are distorted and do not show you the real outline on the ground. Map data may be outdated in some places, but only the vector geometries provided by governments are correct.

Happy mapping.