Oui, merci pour la clarification. Votre première contribution avait été prise à tort pour une erreur : nous voyons tous les jours des nouveaux comptes dont le premier edit est de changer des rues importantes pour vandaliser.

J’avais contrôlé et dans UrbIS le tunnel qui va vers le Cinquantenaire est bien écrit « Tunnel Loi ». Nous allons rapporter à BM de faire corriger la référence dans UrbIS.

Vous nous permettrez néanmoins de changer les noms qui sont uniquement en français. Les données OSM à Bruxelles doivent toujours être écrites dans les deux langues officielles. ;-)

Good!

There is an ongoing effort to import GRB shapefiles onto OSM. It takes a lot of time because one needs to review imports carefully to avoid importing shapes when existing shapes already exist roughly on the same location.
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import

Hello,

I fixed the shape. Next time, please use proper GRB background instead of tracing buildings on aerial imagery.

Have a nice day.

Good but can you please have a look again, because you added the following tag now, which looks weird:
"swimming_pool=swimming_pool"

You can remove this tag entirely. ;-)

("swimming_pool=outdoor" exists in the wiki but it is not useful to tag many details for private objects.)

The recommended tag is "access=private" instead of personal.

A fellow mapper took photos this morning and confirmed the street hasn’t changed.
I’ll undo your edit.

I see, it’s because Organic Maps provides an *easy* way to add translations into other languages, but it’s *difficult* to find the option to modify an existing name, which is what you wanted to do.
This is a known bug, I reported it long ago but apparently it’s not fixed yet.
https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/1478#issuecomment-1002828078

Don’t worry, I fixed it. I also changed the main shop type (chocolate).

The POI for Food King is okay, though.

I had to erase your change.
This is not Molenbeek here, you are near the border betweek Dilbeek and Anderlecht, and the building is on the territory of Dilbeek.

Hello,

Could you please have a second look at your edit.

In every language, name=Jérôme

Except for French where it is name:fr=Jérôme Grimonpon

Are you sure the full name doesn’t apply to everyone?

OK, thanks for your reply. In the meantime we added the tent (building=marquee) to the map.

Hello,

Please do not change name of roads!
This is "Tunnel Loi - Wettunnel".

Tunnel Belliard - Belliardtunnel is not here but here. way/14364265

Your changeset has been reverted.

In OSM we only map what we have seen with our own eyes, as recently as possible.

The street was put one-way last summer when they implemented a new traffic scheme across the entire Cureghem area. They reverted almost everything around October-November because residents were protesting heavily, and launched a new study.

If you have surveyed the place in the last weeks and if you are sure it was a one-way street here, then it is fine and we will keep it. Where does your information come from?

Hello,

Thanks for this.

I am surprised the municipality put it again as a one-way street because it had recently been made a two-way street again.

Just one thing: I warned you in a previous comment about making sure to add exemptions for cyclists (oneway:bicycle=no). Now you do it, this is fine. But please do *not* invent tags such as "oneway:foot=no". Whereas cyclists follow rules for vehicles (because under Belgian law cyclists *are* vehicle drivers), pedestrians can go everywhere in both directions, so you don’t have to do anything special for pedestrian routing on one-way roads. ;-)

I surveyed it tonight. There is no tree here. There is a tree elsewhere on the street, which is already on the map.

Your change has been reverted.

Hello,

On aerial imagery, I see cycle lanes only *north* of this point, not on the entire street.
osm.org/?mlat=50.68628&mlon=4.40372#map=18/50.68628/4.40372

Unless they have painted new cycle lanes on the whole street, I suggest you split the road and use different cycleway tags on each part.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

The location of this POI is a bit weird.
Pictures on their website suggest they are located inside a building.

Would you please be so kind to describe the location where you saw it.

Thanks in advance.

Nobody said that. We shouldn’t create connectors for *any* place where someone may want to cross. We just care to avoid detours by adding logical connectors near T-shaped intersections.
If you are interested in knowing more about how routing works or about mapping sidewalks specifically, we could talk about it one day, no problem.
Happy mapping.

Hello,

We spent considerable care in drawing sidewalks in this area and ensuring to have proper pedestrian crossing. It’s always sad to see comments like this one.

The crossing you deleted was explicitely tagged as an "unmarked" crossing. We know there is no official crossing here, but this is simply a logical connector that is necessary to get proper routing, and the tags were correct. (Such connectors have been manually reviewed and match what a normal pedestrian would do, to ensure realistic results in queries.)

Have a nice day.

Hello,

Good practices in OSM is to use lifecycle prefixes instead of deleting nodes when an activity is gone.
osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
(Unless the place has been walled and will never again host any activity.)

I undeleted the node and tagged it as a vacant activity.