Hello,

Thanks for this. Probably a private sports centre for the school, right? In that case, we should retag it with access=private to avoid being shown to people looking for a sports centre nearby.

Hello,

Can you please tell us the purpose of adding "roundabout=yes" on such roads?

Why do you want this tag?

It is not documented anywhere in the wiki.

Also, did you make sure that this is really a roundabout and not just a circular road?

Thanks in advance.

## REVERTED CHANGESET

Please do not add roundabout tags when this is legally not a roundabout.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=469653042194831

Sorry but, again, this mechanical edit is completely misguided.

There is no roundabout here.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=591746126626916

Your edit has been reverted.

Hello,

This may *look* like a roundabout to you but its legal status is *not* a roundabout.

We’ll have to revert your edit.

There was a typo in the changeset title because the wrong tag, which was correctly removed here, is "layer=-1".

If you want to mention that a road is below the surface (while not being in a tunnel), level=-1 would be okay.

If you want to ask questions, you can reach out through direct messages instead of commenting on random changesets, because this gives the false impression that this changeset damaged the map (it did not).

Hello,

You did not reply to this comment.
But I found out that you made another changeset here: changeset/171772522 intended as a fix.

I made some additional fixes, it should be okay now.

operator=Solid'R.

I don’t believe Solid’R collects glass bottles and cooking oil. That is for the other containers in this area, right?

Don’t forget to keep tags in sync.
30 km/h is the default urban speed in Brussels whereas 50 km/h is the exception. "source:maxspeed" is used for that purpose. You can not just change the maxspeed tag and ignore the rest.

Fixed by changeset/171827634

Thanks for this.

Instead of a hard noexit tag (that applies to every mode of transport), shouldn’t we create a short connector between node/13127929852 and the intersection with Rysheuvelsstraat? It looks like cyclists and pedestrians can go through.

Thanks for adding details here.

However, please do not use tags such as "layer=1" on buildings if the purpose is to evade validator warnings.

In this edit, as long as in yesterday’s edit, you created a long footway across a building (way/1428252282). This mistake triggered the warning. Cheating with the layer tags gets rid of the warning but keeps the error.

The correct way to map those situations is to cut the footway when crossing the building and tag the inner part as tunnel=building_passage.

Example of a fix here: way/1427974749

I see you used the iD online editor.
The building tag was probably added if you clicked on a building preset, e.g. "Craft Brewery".
Don’t worry, it’s already fixed anyway.

OK, thanks for the explanation. I see you commened on the original changeset, so that the discussion can take place with the mapper who initiated this move. Well done!

Hello,
Changing the brewery type is okay BUT please do not add "building=yes" on a polygon encompassing several existing buildings and please do not add addresses that are already on the map. Overlapping building structures or duplicate addresses are not desirable on the map.
I fixed yours various edits from today.

Hello,

I suspect there is a false-positive issue from Osmose here.

A user recently retagged the railway lines and provided an explanation why the operator tag should be changed.
changeset/170020049

Probably that Osmose uses the wrong validation list… which prompted you to undo this mapper’s work.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

I am afraid to tell you that your change is misguided.

The official name in Dutch is "Bergense Steenweg" for the entire road across Anderlecht. This name is written in two words on street signs as well as in the UrbIS database, which is the official reference for street names in the Brussels Region.

The "Bergensesteenweg" spelling is found in Sint-Pieters-Leeuw only, not in Brussels.

We will revert your change.

You are welcome.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for your recent edits.
However, can you please make sure to write real changeset titles when you send uploads to the database.

"adding data" is not an acceptable changeset description. It provides no useful information. After all, we are all adding data here.

More explanations on the OpenStreetMap wiki.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.

Bonjour,

Ne pas dupliquer les liens Wikipédia sur les objets OSM, svp.

Il y a déjà un lien "wikidata" qui lie *toutes* les langues. C’est comme ceci que les apps peuvent fournir le lien approprié.

+ Éventuellement 1 (un) lien Wikipédia dans la langue locale. Pas plus.

All right, thanks for this. I’ll retag it as broken, then.