OpenStreetMap
bisonprarieafternoon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 120231821 | Hello, the name "Four Season RV Park should be used to tag the whole RV park not just the swimming pool. The name field is not to describe who owns a given object. |
|
| 120231793 | Hello it would be more proper to do "building=yes
For Burger King, you are using the ID editor if you search burger king it will actually put all this information in for the building. |
|
| 120231309 | Hello, this is probably just better left as just a pond, name=* should not be used for descriptions.
Also I see you are another student in a GIS class at Pittsburg State University. Is there anyway you could let us know what teacher you are doing this for maybe share their name or email, can message it to me rather then sharing it on a changeset comment |
|
| 120180013 | These shouldn't be marked as buildings, an area with building=* should only include the actual physical building. These should be marked as landuse=residential
and probably include the parking lots with it as i assume these are all part of the Crimson Villas complex. |
|
| 119978490 | There is already a house node for that location would have been better to move and then turn that into an area. Also putting names on houses is incorrect. "some rules are: Do not map where individual people live, in particular do not add the names of inhabitants to dwellings."
|
|
| 120169643 | sport=shot-put would be a valid tag if they are for shotput, could also just leave them as a genetic pitch for now if your unsure. |
|
| 120141969 | Hey I would advise against doing this type of clean up here, the person who imported these things with the old landuse tags don't actually correspond to how we use landuse in OSM. So a lot of the farmland and others end up include pasture which would be meadow and stuff considered farmyard. Just changing the tags makes this no better and if not worse, I have been debating just deleting all these as it was a really bad import done over a decade ago |
|
| 116561244 | Hello, A lot of these buildings aren't squared your using the ID editor so make sure you press q to square up the buildings. Also the reason the buildings footprints might not match the default imagery Bing could very well be that Bing was wrong. Judging by some traces in the area i think ESRI imagery is more accurate. If you live in the area a few GPS trace could allow you to align the bing imagery closer to the correct location. I can't say what imagery is newest the ESRI imagery is from 2017 not sure how old the Bing stuff is. I sent you a link to the OpenStreetMap Slack they can help guide you as I see you are new. |
|
| 62185190 | http://www.bradnerstadium.com/
|
|
| 62185202 | Do you have a source for this city changing, name searching around I can't find evidence of it. Wikipedia still has it under the old name, and searching the name gives me no news mentioning a name change
|
|
| 62180267 | If that is a roundabout it is not mapped quite correctly. I am not an expert in mapping roundabouts, but just going how they should be tagged it is missing some information. Here is the wiki article on it
|
|
| 62180060 | The address node should be separate from the way for the road, the name tag is also not to be used for a description of the object, but what it is called, like the name of a road.
|
|
| 62113138 | Hello, when mapping houses please try to map to the building footprint on the ground, and please make sure you are making use of the squaring tool in the ID editor.
|
|
| 60937530 | Hello, just curious where you can find information on this park I can't seem to find evidence of its existence, did you maybe mean to mark this as residential area? Also the name was put on the top right node rather then the area just a fyi. |