bernardo60's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144576860 | way/1227523864 cannot be a "living street" because it is only one metre wide and therefore it has to be a path. Do you mind if I change your tag to path? I am actually living here in the neighborhood. Thanks for contributing to OSM. |
|
| 147356412 | To give you an example what I mean with clutter, just look at way/725759528 and all the "residential tags" in its vicinity. |
|
| 147356412 | Hi there!
|
|
| 138137324 | Hi Husni Way way/1089033345 is not a track, but a path. No four-wheeled vehicle can go there. I originally tagged it as a path and you changed it, I am curious, on what basis? Thx |
|
| 129925012 | Not sure why you added a cliff with the name "longsor"? Let me know what your intention was. Thx |
|
| 136932779 | way/1178763610 was not a track, but a path, only 1.2m wide. There are many ways in Bali far too narrow for 4-wheel-vehicles, but enough for motorbikes. If you import based on aerial map, better err on the side of caution, call it a path unless you know better, otherwise drivers can get into problems. Thank you and Merry Christmas! |
|
| 144035169 | way/586178172 is not a residential road, it is a concrete path only wide enough for motorbikes. Please do not re-tag my original classifications based on ground survey. I live with 100m of this place! |
|
| 101713862 | Hi Shek not sure why this way inmidst of fields became a residential road. This is not residential area, but rice fields, the road is used mostly for land access. Hope you dont mind if I changed it back. Thx |
|
| 133773143 | Hi Aliffia - this must be a misunderstanding. Tracks can be used by motorcycles and cars, their prominent use is by farmers. I went through this area three days ago and most ricefields became building plots, therefore your previous tag "residential road" is justified. But not "living street". "Living street" is a concept used in Indonesia for "gang", but this is debatable. Hope you are okay if I changed to "residential" |
|
| 133773143 | Consider changing highway=residential to highway=track. The residential tag is used on roads that primarily provide access to, or within, RESIDENTIAL AREAS. However, this is a rural area giving primarily access to fields and plantations. The few houses along the road does not make this area a "residential area". The land use is agricultural and tree plantations. Let me know whether you want to discuss further. Thanks for contributing to OSM!
|
|
| 142458107 | Consider changing highway=residential to highway=track. The residential tag is used on roads that primarily provide access to, or within, RESIDENTIAL AREAS. However, this is a rural area giving primarily access to fields and plantations. The few houses along the road does not make this area a "residential area". The land use is agricultural and tree plantations. Let me know whether you want to discuss further. Thanks for contributing to OSM!
|
|
| 142868769 | Consider changing highway=residential to highway=track. The residential tag is used on roads that provide access to, or within, residential areas. However, this is a rural area (consider land use) giving access to fields and plantations primarily. The few houses along the road does not make this area a "residential area". It is farm land primarily.
|
|
| 141657966 | This is a rural road part of the public network, giving access to fields and forests. Therefore highway=service should not be used.
|
|
| 142868533 | Hi - are you sure there is a railway there? I know the area and this might a mistake which I just reverted to its original classification. Let me know whether you have some questions about it. Thx
|
|
| 142868533 | Hi - are you sure there is a railway there? I know the area and this might a mistake which I just reverted to its original classification. Let me know whether you have some questions about it. Thx
|
|
| 142868656 | Hi Kike. Thanks for your contribution. Looking at this road, it appears to be a rural road used primarily for giving access to fields, and not so much for residential use. Consider re-tagging it to highway=track
|
|
| 142868673 | Hi Frederic - are you sure this highway is wide enough for cars to pass? Otherwise just call it a path. And it should be connected to some other ways. Thanks for your contribution!
|
|
| 142868685 | Hi Arnaud, my neighbour, I suppose! Surprise surprise. Regarding this changeset, instead of footpath, I would call it a path, because most likely, the farmers go there by motorbike. And the path is disconnected, can you not connect it to another way? Let me know if you have more questions.
|
|
| 120727690 | If someone used the tag "path" based on a survey, you should not retag it as "track", without consulting that person. Thanks for your understanding. |
|
| 120727690 | I wonder why you changed from path to track. This is less than 2m wide, impossible for a car to pass. I change back to path. I went there today on my bike. |