berms's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 64710081 | Hi reflexz. Thank you for the message. I have removed the buildings using newer imagery from Esri. |
|
| 65482806 | Hi muralito, Mapillary does not show any signage indicating there is a left turn restriction. The existing turn restriction was preventing users from turning south onto Avenida Los Quilmes (way/324772495), which is why I removed the relation. |
|
| 63685680 | Great, look forward to hearing from you. Thanks! |
|
| 64189068 | Hi JKHougaard, I noticed you deleted the primary link (adjacent to way/527043298) that connected Århusvej to Lunbakkevej. SDFE aerial imagery and Mapillary both confirm there is a physical barrier separating the road. Can you please confirm if this link no longer exists? |
|
| 63685680 | Hi mikkolukas, I noticed you added a construction tag on way/301270578 based on your observation, and was wondering if you could confirm if the segment has reopened? |
|
| 64904459 | I will keep that in mind and leave more detailed changeset comments. Thanks! |
|
| 64904459 | Hello Hjart, I was using the osm.wiki/Relation:restriction policy. The way/509015727 was originally set as the “to” member of a no_left_turn relation when in fact the way functions as a straight-through connection, not left turn. This why I changed it to a “only_straight_on” relation. The restriction will still function the same. Thanks,
|
|
| 63316546 | Hi JKHougaard, I added back the Bag Rådhuset segment for emergency vehicle access as advised. Thank you for the helpful feedback. |
|
| 63024611 | Hi, yes, the image I used was from Digital Globe from August 1, 2018. |
|
| 59549709 | Thank you for the message. I see where the issue was created which caused a gap and intersection between the wood multipolygon ways. I appreciate you making the correction. |
|
| 59550890 | I see that the wetland was accidentally collapsed. Thank you for making the correction and bringing it to my attention. |
|
| 56624661 | Hi mweper. Thank you for the helpful feedback! The reason I was using DG Premium is because the DG Premium Vintage grid data is actually showing as more recent imagery. I would agree with you that Bing imagery is too outdated in this area to use. Going forward, I’ll consider both DG imagery tile sets. Also, thank you for also suggesting the GPS traces that you provided! I’ll take a look. Regards,
|