OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164610099

Welcome to OSM o0elMira0o.

I'm glad to see someone citing local knowledge fill in the track. I was not comfortable doing it from imagery alone having not seen it.

I've changed the tagging from narrow_gauge to miniature and marked the track gauge=184 (mm) based internet sources saying its 1/8 scale. Do correct that if you have more precise information, as it appears 190 is also an option, such as here.

way/613631580

110542862

Yes, I see what you are talking about now and doubt doubt there may have been very small bridge that escapes my memory. Thanks for checking!

110542862

Greg Rose:
Have you seen this bridge?

way/978314272
I hiked this about 11 months before you marked it. The fords are real. If there's a bridge here, I've forgotten it.
It seems odd to have a bridge over a small creek that can only be accessed by four fords of a bigger creek.

Unfortunately, my one photo is of the cabin taken with the creek to my back.

141140150

been fixed by SuzanneTF1

changeset/141140150#map=17/35.680372/-80.477890&layers=N

161568170

I've removed the name tags from individual buildings as the complex has been tagged on the landuse element. This is an instance of "One feature, one OSM element" practice.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Thanks for your contributions.

157236638

It looks like this was intended as a joke. We really don't appreciated people messing with the integrity of our data. However, if you'd like make some constructive edits here, I'm sure we can find things for you to contribute.

73812260

You've added names to many nodes within the Memphis airport taxiways. Can you leave a comment on the following note about what these are?

note/4592305

161251970

Correction: Source note #4583930 by Mathieu Bernier + #4554135 from mapbox

161216991

sourcing also from ESRI and Bing of the construction site

161216133

... and Horry county GIS

160343597

A section of this road was barricaded for permanent removal on 4 December 2024 and has been torn up. I have again removed this section of road after surveying it on 07 December.

159941674

FYI, that article is a little misleading. Only the connection to university parkway was removed. There are a couple houses on this road which still need access form the other end. I've restored it to where it actually is barricaded this morning.

changeset/160030983

159378287

I think I've fixed it.

159702218

My previous comment was unclear. This trail was previously closed for several year and is currently open.

154184946

RedCyberPandaz:
Welcome to OSM! Your tags on these two objects look good, and this project often lacks on-the-ground input for rural areas.

I would suggest making this two separate edits in the future as it is easier for others to follow what you did.

152772228

Looks good to me! I'm marking the note on this issue resolved.

note/4294467

152076459

Adeyyyyy:
Please stop making false edits.

In this changeset, you have added a city with a population of nearly half a million people where ESRI imagery shown no evidence of human habitation.

I suspect many, if not all, of your edits are false, as I have found no verification for any of your work that I've attempted to follow up on.

Specifically:
I find no internet evidence for "Samsung Supermarketa" in Sumsun, Turkey
node/11947633342

The Pharmacy in Morocco to which you've assigned an address, has a different address on the cross street according to several internet sources. The Kaart imagery you cite exists for this street, but I can't find a house number on the building.
way/611625922

I find no internet evidence for Hearts Restaurant in Warsaw.
node/11944642665

Consider this a warning before I report your account for abuse. If you would like to rebuild your credibility within OSM, please cite and explain your sources well. I would recommend StreetComplete's photo tool for any survey work you need evidence of.

152026137

Have you been there, or can you otherwise identify the source for this info?

122329709

I've just corrected what I believe was a mistake in marking this section of railway as disused.

way/12116002

While the section of track going to R-Area, formerly part of this way, is indeed obviously removed from imagery, the track to H area is actively use for spent nuclear fuel transport to the nuclear fuel reprocessing line located there.

81795371

Hi tingliu:
Does this item "GPS User" actually exist?

node/7264979662

It has been proposed that your changeset comment "for practice" may indicate you didn't actually intend to change the map.

note/4164685