Correction: Source note #4583930 by Mathieu Bernier + #4554135 from mapbox

sourcing also from ESRI and Bing of the construction site

... and Horry county GIS

A section of this road was barricaded for permanent removal on 4 December 2024 and has been torn up. I have again removed this section of road after surveying it on 07 December.

FYI, that article is a little misleading. Only the connection to university parkway was removed. There are a couple houses on this road which still need access form the other end. I've restored it to where it actually is barricaded this morning.

changeset/160030983

I think I've fixed it.

My previous comment was unclear. This trail was previously closed for several year and is currently open.

RedCyberPandaz:
Welcome to OSM! Your tags on these two objects look good, and this project often lacks on-the-ground input for rural areas.

I would suggest making this two separate edits in the future as it is easier for others to follow what you did.

Looks good to me! I'm marking the note on this issue resolved.

note/4294467

Adeyyyyy:
Please stop making false edits.

In this changeset, you have added a city with a population of nearly half a million people where ESRI imagery shown no evidence of human habitation.

I suspect many, if not all, of your edits are false, as I have found no verification for any of your work that I've attempted to follow up on.

Specifically:
I find no internet evidence for "Samsung Supermarketa" in Sumsun, Turkey
node/11947633342

The Pharmacy in Morocco to which you've assigned an address, has a different address on the cross street according to several internet sources. The Kaart imagery you cite exists for this street, but I can't find a house number on the building.
way/611625922

I find no internet evidence for Hearts Restaurant in Warsaw.
node/11944642665

Consider this a warning before I report your account for abuse. If you would like to rebuild your credibility within OSM, please cite and explain your sources well. I would recommend StreetComplete's photo tool for any survey work you need evidence of.

Have you been there, or can you otherwise identify the source for this info?

I've just corrected what I believe was a mistake in marking this section of railway as disused.

way/12116002

While the section of track going to R-Area, formerly part of this way, is indeed obviously removed from imagery, the track to H area is actively use for spent nuclear fuel transport to the nuclear fuel reprocessing line located there.

Hi tingliu:
Does this item "GPS User" actually exist?

node/7264979662

It has been proposed that your changeset comment "for practice" may indicate you didn't actually intend to change the map.

note/4164685

description incorrect, intended to say: add vocational school

This is not a dam. Rae's Creek is dammed by a earthen embankment here to form the lake and the canal, which have equal water level.

The embankment is here.
way/952456924

There is a spillway here.
way/545715329

Under typical conditions the water level is regulated by letting water down the canal here.
way/478371980

Has amenity=drinking_water been used to mark a stream here? While I realize that knowledge of streams is useful as a hiking water source, that OSM tag is intended to mark potable water sources, like a drinking fountains.

amenity=drinking_water

See note/4117556

Is there construction here? The article from last month sounds like the proposers are still seeking funding.

Under the good practice of "map what's on the ground" I think a proposal to build something--particularly unfunded--is out of scope for inclusion in OSM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

description should read:
replaced inappropriately marked "rough" over entire course boundary with leisure=golf_course and appropriate tags

Note #4050736 by ChainsawCowboy concerning this edit.

"I used to rent this building so I am positive about the address."

Reversion:
changeset/146522116

Repeat of the intended work:
changeset/146522306