OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92759740

osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.54291%2C-2.56197%3B51.54409%2C-2.56338#map=17/51.54344/-2.56404

but our customers and bing satellite confirms that a right turn is possible

92759740

oneway obstructs ride from Bradley Stoke Way in Woodlands Lane. see bing satellite

92334439

Thanks for your help, Jan!

88814383

Hi, jb54osm! Perhaps you are aware of the condition of these roads along Eglantierhof street? Could you advise us or make any changes you know? Thanks!

changeset/92334439#map=19/52.09013/4.38499

92334439

Hi, Eggie! I used PDOK images, as indicated in my comment, and I also have information from customers that it is possible to drive along this road. Bring back, please

86863382

please, added barrier type

88705820

Hi, trigpoint! Yeah, you right. Changed that. Cheers

87187851

hi! our drivers use this road. navigation works better with service roads. please, if you have information, add a gate. thanks!

86775440

modified to service. cheers!

86761879

yes probably In rural contexts it suits more. fixed. thanks!

86775262

not sure. If you have additional information, you can make the appropriate changes. thanks!

86775440

and again, most of the road leads to residential buildings. I do not have access information, I changed only the classification of the road for more accurate routing. Thanks!

86761879

most of the road leads to residential buildings and only at the very end goes to the farm (service). modified it. thanks for feedback!

85500384

Hi! Thanks for your feedback. I didn't draw a footway for lack of information, I added only a driveway. Corrected the footpath according to community rules. Cheers!

81387220

Thanks! I did it... again))

81387220

Hi! Yeah, I'm added motor vehicle=no and created bollard for the neighbor similar road. Thanks!

76748106

Hello. Thank you for comment and recent details. Fixed back

76377047

Hi! Thanks for your comment. Changed to highway=construction

76204147

Yeah. Thanks for your message and information. I fixed back

61404124

Hi Eggie,

Thanks for your comment. I went back and looked at my edit and realized that the imagery i used was not recent. I'll be more careful going forward with such changes i make, and also reach out to the contributor for clasifications prior to deleting any existing data.

Thanks again,

Dzmitry