Yeah, there is more than one, because I still haven't figured out how to combine type=building (for all the different building parts which I already found mapped, but which needed a but of TLC) and type=multipolygon for the courtyard bit.

thanks!

It's a friend's property, there was never that small building; it could have been a trailer or larger car. You didn't comment on the trees, but he has been felling a few the last couple of days, and I wanted to make sure to mark the ones that are still there.
The changeset sources might have been left over from a previous changeset, sorry about that.

yeah, maybe the thing I thought was a car is actually the information sign, because the other locations with information signs there, it looks like there is something of the same shape.

No, it was still there, when I visited last. I think what I meant was that there is no plaque with the date on site, but that the farmer told us the date. It's been a while, though, so I'm not 100% sure that's what I meant.

Anything that is no longer on the ground should not be mapped as still existing, especially when it's gone 100 years or more. Please use lifecycle prefixes or consider moving it to https://www.openhistoricalmap.org with the appropriate dates like name:1880 or description:1880, description:1939 etc

Good question. There are numbers displayed at the William Robertson Way roundabout, but can't read them. Maybe they're secondary_link roads? I've retagged the Circular Road as such, but the value is not documented here: osm.wiki/Ireland/Roads But it links secondary roads.

It is indeed, I have added that information. Thanks for pointing it out; it was a tag I was not familiar with.

I'd say that "service" might describe it better.

It sure should, and it does now. Thanks for pointing it out!

THanks for notifing me. "Origin" is not a good key, because in many cases, the stones have been "moved from" a location where they had already been re-used or exhibited which was not their original location. I've changed them all to "moved_from", though.

is it better now?

The possible Southern ringfort is marked as wetland on earlier maps, I'd say that's all it is.

I think it must have been. It should be fixed now.

it is actually a street cabinet according to mapillary. No idea what I did there.

Thanks for the research and fix!

Thanks for the research and fix!

Dear Lord! I've reverted it. Must have pressed Q without realising.

indeed

Maybe leisure=swimming_area would be more appropriate, if this really is the case? The surface does not seem to fall under the definition on the wiki.