Thanks for the contributions loralyn. There are a couple of problems that exist with adding the fact that the school is part of the town. First, you shouldn't just draw an arbitrary way (line) and tag it as being a town. The town boundary already exists and it should be modified. Another problem is the truth of that school belonging to the town of Ebensburg or Cambria. I don't have enough knowledge as I'm not a local so I don't want to make the corrections myself without knowing the history. But it seems like your way (1246747603) should be deleted at the least, and then some clarification should be made as to where the school actually belongs.

I definitely blame the tools, but I think it is far more than just iD. I wonder if there is some shared component that introduces the bug across several editors. I should do some analysis.

No worries. It happens all the time. Probably some subtle bug in the editor you're using.

FYI, something broke with your toolchain and the output made it into the website tag.

Phone numbers in my area don’t have an area code or country code, but the correct format is to include both of those. Same idea for website URLs.

Thanks for your note. Could you please expand what you mean by this comment? It’s not clear to me which edit you have a problem with and what that problem is exactly. Thanks.

I’m not sure what the purpose of this comment was. Is there a request for an action to be taken?

The bot isn’t arbitrarily adding a trailing /

What?

Hey vgeorge, thanks for the report.

The bot doesn't prepend "www" to any URL. It also doesn't add a trailing "/" to them either. If you look at a request to the previous URL, you can see what the website is redirecting people to:

$ curl -I http://virviramos.com.br
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:20:32 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Location: https://www.virviramos.com.br//

I'm hesitant to make any assumptions and replace the erroneous "//" with a single "/" or even remove it altogether. What are your thoughts?

I did a query on this in my area and found dozens of websites that redirect to https://www.example.com//, so it is far from uncommon.

“You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”.

― John Lydgate

I've tried it both ways (few changesets with many changes, and many changesets with few changes) and someone always complains about it. Sorry, I'm going to stick with it as it is. I wish it wasn't something people complained about.

Can you look at node/685284562 ? It got messed up during your change and I'm not sure what the cleanest way to fix it is. Maybe you could help?

node/5899284188 has a broken website link. I'm not sure what it should be. Someone should either fix it or delete it.

Can you take a look at way/384638461? It seems to zig-zag and cross all over itself, and that goes against basic mapping rules. If you could clean that up, it would be appreciated. Thanks.

It looks like you've duplicated every fairway (and maybe other features) on this golf course. For example: way/703510295 and way/907234897 are the same polygon. There should only be one polygon. Could you go back through and clean up your dupes? Thanks.

Hi there Chris, I'm trying to clean up all the golf courses and I see you are making "less-than-ideal" edits that I eventually come around to and spend a lot of time "fixing". I'm not saying they are outright errors, but if I could get you to do them in a different way, it would save a lot of headaches.

Take way/1211821702 for example. You are marking the boundary of the bunker with two polygons in order to not map the center rough(?) island. What should really be done is to first map the rough outline, then the bunker, and then select both areas (shift click) and then combine them in a "multipolygon" relationship by pressing the "C" shortcut in iD. The same style of mapping should be applied to fairways that span multiple holes. If they butt up against each other, they should be drawn as one large boundary and then "combine" them with the "inner" features like tees, greens, bunkers, water hazards, etc.

If you could do this going forward, that would be immensely helpful to me in my clean-up. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks.

Depends on what is meant by "North". If it is in Lane County, then yes, I'll get around to it at some point. I usually remember as our monthly dinner meetup approaches.

Great. Good to know. Thanks Chris. I just figured it would be unusual for someone to replace a pool with a putting green, so I wanted to make sure it wasn't someone armchair mapping without knowing what is currently on the ground and picking the wrong sat imagery. (And yes, comments/replies on changesets generate email notifications.)

Do you know this course personally? I find it hard to believe they would tear out a pool to put in a putting green. The Bing imagery shows construction of what would become the pool. Can you please go back and correct this? (way/1185318810)

Hi there. OpenStreetMap is not the place to draw in course routes for temporary events. Sidewalks already exist and you're adding duplicate information which shouldn't be done. I'll be deleting this community walk wherever I see it.

There are other tools for drawing your own map for private use. Try looking up umap.

Thanks.