Nah, I’m manually tracing it mainly on Maxar.

Hi Patrick,
I'm unsure if you're tagging these ways correctly. You've tagged almost all of these roads in this and your previous changesets as "highway=residential", but my understanding is that, for minor roads like driveways and parking aisles, they should be tagged "highway=service". Could you please review your previous five changesets?
Always open for discussion,
David (azsr)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89523905

Thanks for making the changes promptly!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89525297

Hi, thanks for your response!

For point 2, I'm mainly thinking of two ways, both of which are from previous changesets:
Darling St. way/19362747/history , you appeared to extend the way into the right-of-way of some high-voltage transmission lines. From what I can tell on Maxar, the road extends into a small trail which is impassable to cars.
Cut-through between James and Edman Sts, across from Corona Dr. way/836924262/history , As far as I can tell there is no road here.

Could you please check those ways?
Thanks!
David (azsr)

Hi, thanks for contributing! However, I have a few concerns with this changeset and your two previous ones:
1. I noticed you tagged most of these roads with "highway=residential". This has a specific meaning in OSM, which is a road that generally gives access to multiple residences. In my opinion, some of your roads would be better tagged as "highway=service", such as the access roads to the airport and many of the single-family driveways.
2. Some of your "highway=residential" do not seem to exist. I'm referencing Maxar Premium Imagery, which is the most recent imagery for this area and is leafless, making it the best imagery for validating contributions.
Can you please double-check your contributions? I'm open for discussion.

Thanks,
David (azsr)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89375901

Hi, thanks for contributing! I noticed you tagged the new service road with "access=customers". I'm not sure this is appropriate because this service road primarily gives access to the loading docks in the back of the store. This road would most often be used by suppliers restocking the store, and customers wouldn't really have a reason to go back there. If you don't object, in changeset/89256331 I have removed this tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88980091