Hi,
In this edit, you abbreviated the directions in the address. These are fully spelled out in OpenStreetMap. Also, many buildings, including this one, have 90° angles at each corner. The editor you were using includes a tool to help make these square angles. You select the building and press the "q" button, or you right click it and select the option to square corners.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. For some reason you deleted the inner edge of Wayne High's track, so I restored that. Also, the entrance tag should be on buildings where there is a door. Thank you for your contributions, and happy mapping!

Hi,
I'm guessing that you aren't aware that we have access to more up-to-date imagery already that shows the driveways that you deleted. In the editor's sidebar on the right, you click the Background Settings button (the one that looks like 3 sheets of paper) to reveal the options. I'm going to go ahead and restore the ones that you deleted and add the rest of the driveways in the neighborhood to match the ones nearby.
Happy mapping!

Hi,
I reverted this edit because it only deleted a driveway. Driveways are mapped in OpenStreetMap. Please see service=driveway for more information on tagging driveways.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. Why did you decide to limit the beach to that extent? It currently goes out much further than that. The wiki page says that either mapping to the high water line or low water line is fine, though, if we mapped this beach to the high water line, it'd be gone entirely. natural=beach

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. Just so you know, the park tag is for manicured community open spaces. I retagged the area that you had labeled as the Bridger Estates Grounds as a residential area because a residential development has been put in there over the last decade. Please see leisure=park for more information.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that in this edit you deleted a bunch of driveways. Driveways are commonly mapped features in OpenStreetMap, and it looks like the ones that you deleted were valid. Is there a particular reason that you deleted them, or was it a mistake?

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. In OpenStreetMap, residential addresses are mapped at the location of the house, not attached to the street. I'm not sure which side of the street 7891 is on. If you'd like to map the address, you can create a node and use the Address preset and fill out the fields.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I couldn't get past the fact that you copied from Google Maps. Contributors to OpenStreetMap are not allowed to copy from Google Maps. Please see osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for more information.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think that it's good. You did accidentally remove the building tag from your Windham location, so I fixed that, and I also added a link to your website to both locations.
Thank you for your contribution!

Hi,
This business has several small buildings in it, not one big building. Businesses that span several buildings are better off being represented as a node.

Hi,
In OpenStreetMap, we separate the house number and street names in addresses. So for this address, the house number of 75 goes in the number field, and the street name of 2nd East goes in the street field. Because this address has a directional prefix, the expanded version of that goes in the street field as well, for a totally expanded street name of "South 200 East". Also, when you are creating area features that are the size of one building, you should add building tags to that feature.

Hi,
In OpenStreetMap, we expand abbreviations in street names and addresses. For example, a street name that is abbreviated as "Coyote Gulch Ct", is expanded to "Coyote Gulch Court". Also, most buildings have 90° angles. The editor you were using has a tool to help create these neat angles. When you have a building selected, press the "q" key, and the corners will become squared. Or you can right click on the building and press the button to square corners.

Hi,
I decided to change Utah State Route 900 back to unclassified. While there is some language in the Wiki saying that state routes can be tagged as secondary, this route is a special case because it was only created for political reasons and connects no population centers.

Hi,
Once again, Cherry Peak is much larger than this single building.

Hi,
Why did you decide to tag the entire building with the tags of one of the tenants? Why did you pick that tenant over the other?

Hmm, interesting, I wonder how that got started in Nevada. Regardless, in Utah we try to follow national and global guidance as much as we can (though with some locally controversial deviations like with street names). Here are some relevant Wiki pages. This page describes the tagging for the fueling area: amenity=fuel. And this page describes the one feature, one element guideline: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element.

Hi,
In this edit you duplicated all of the contact and address information for the gas station and convenience store across 4 objects, and the descriptive tags for the gas station and convenience store across 2 objects. I have never seen this style of mapping before, and can't find it documented anywhere in the Wiki. Do you have some sort of textual back-up for not following the one feature, one element guideline?

That's up to them. Some routers don't honor access tags, and maybe they don't as well. You could ask them following the instructions at https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216917777-How-do-I-contact-Strava-Support- and https://support.garmin.com/en-US/ respectively. They ought to consider through-routing down an access=private roadway as a bug, imo. They can't assume any individual user has permission to be there.

Hi,
This road cannot meet the definition of "no" access because it is the only access to lots 25 and 25-1. Also, those homes do not look abandoned. I mentioned that in a previous changeset comment as well.